• Potatos_are_not_friends@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    51
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    Nassim Nicholas Taleb, the author of the economics book, The Black Swan, had a great take on this. I’m paraphrasing but he was like how Economists can go in the news, make a prediction, and if they’re wrong, nothing. But if they’re right, they become a staple of business news and sell out all of their books. So financially, it’s better to make a lot of predictions and hope to win the “I guess right” lottery.

    • bradorsomething@ttrpg.network
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      9 months ago

      Jesse Livermoore said “the markets act, and the papers look for the explanation.” It was true 100 years ago and it’s true now.

      • randompasta@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        9 months ago

        That’s like me at the stop light trying to predict when it will change. “1, 2, 3… change”…“1, 2, 3…change”. “1, 2, 3 change” light changes. I feel smug in my elite ability to predict the change.

        • bradorsomething@ttrpg.network
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          9 months ago

          You’re very correct. The market is very much a predator and prey relationship, and the justifications afterwards are for the fans at home. I once saw the whole market tilt because one man (Bill Hwang) lost his leveraged multibillion dollar position.

    • whotookkarl@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      9 months ago

      There’s an old scam that runs the same way. On a 2 outcome wager like which team wins a game send 500 people prediction team A wins and 500 people team B wins. For the 500 people who got the right one send 250 team C wins and the other 250 team D wins. By the time you’re down to ~7 people they all received 7 winning predictions in a row, then you ask them for a bet on a ‘sure thing’ for the 8th game.