• Piecemakers@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Multiple hints. Multiple. It doesn’t matter how many, but the simple fact that it’s always more than one is what boggles the damn mind.

    I mean, over the years, I’ve come to terms with never really knowing how, but: why? That at least can be delved into, I think. What is it that inspires such courses of action? Is it blithe & blissful ignorance, or actually something more like cogently willful disregard? Is it some collective allure of pushing one’s luck, or some deep-seated need to watch it all burn? 😅

    • lumbearjack@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I think it boils down to the fact that scenarios and encounters are designed to be the adventure. Extreme circumstances aside, to a player, running away feels like avoiding the adventure or worse- failing it.

      As DMs, we know that hints are left for periphery details. A DM shouldn’t be designing an encounter to be certain death, and they also have the power to have the players fail forward into new scenarios even if it becomes one. If an encounter must be deadly, then there should be no hints, you should be saying flat out this is not an encounter where the goal is victory through combat. Combat will mean death. Their characters can feel it in their bones.

      DMs ought to avoid making encounters where the best course of action is to not engage with it on the players terms. And at worst, have more creative fail states than a TPK.