• SnipingNinja@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Steam is a natural monopoly, which although still not entirely good but are a wholly different beast from monopolies made by exploiting flaws in the system

    • nora@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      What’s a natural monopoly? Valve currently has the freedom to implement anything they want within an extent because they’re so popular. If they decided they wanted to charge devs 35% would people stop using it? Probably not. Steam’s monopoly is as bad as any other for the same reason any other monopoly is bad.

      • coltorl@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        A natural monopoly is when an industry is difficult to break into, making competition difficult or impossible. This favors incumbents, in fact, a lot of industries are natural monopolies (pharma, aerospace, chip production).

        The difficulty of breaking into an industry may be because:

        • new players cannot compete with established scale
        • start up costs require a nearly all-or-nothing approach, high risk
        • regulations tie the hand of new innovators
      • SnipingNinja@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Look it up? It’s an actual term, not something I made up for whatever reason you assumed to argue against something I didn’t even say. I already said it’s still not a good thing, it just would have happened regardless of whoever that was able to do it on scale first.