I have one of the Moto Edges, can’t say I have many complaints outside of the slow charging and a dead pixel that developed a year in.

The edges didn’t bother me as much as I thought it would, I can even use it as trigger to play Citra games which I couldn’t do with a flat phone so that was nifty. Clean software, long battery life, but terrible update schedule though.

  • RST987@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    I use a Moto G50 5G, my wife use a Moto e32s and most of folks in my work use some kind of Motorola phone. My work phone is also a cheaper Motorola. No dead pixels, charging time is fine, build quality is good. Updates could be pushed more often for the OS. IMO Moto phones are good budget devices, but I don’t see where is the money flowing when buying flagship one. Like the Law of Diminishing Returns is cranked up to 110 for this company.

  • ProfessionalBoofis@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Some of the best android phones, especially for the price. They seem to last forever and have good non-bloated software + unique features like shake for flashlight (why don’t other OEMS have this?). Only complaints I have are some lack of custom ROM support and sometimes wear over time. But for the price they are almost unbeatable.

    • emberwit@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      shake for flashlight (why don’t other OEMS have this?)

      As often as moto phones are praised for this feature, the reason has to be that they own a patent on this and other manufacturers are not allowed to just copy it. Can’t imagine it’s difficult to do with some customization though.

  • liori@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I’m not a person who’d be loyal to a brand. Yet Motorola consistently produces devices that turn out to be the best trade-offs (price to functionality) for me. And, so far, all these devices were pretty durable as well, though it’s not that I really put smartphones into lots of use. That’s all I can say.

  • Nathaniel Wyvern@mastodon.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    @MargotRobbie Used to be decent value, but they’ve made a mess of it with far too many very similar models with pointless specs like 2-5mp macro lenses and such, also their update policy is abysmal, my motorola G4 play got left to rot lol. Not the only manufacturer guilty of this of course.

    I also think they should bring Ready For to as many devices in their lineup as they can. It’s an interesting differentiator.

    • Margot Robbie@lemmy.worldOPM
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Let me tell you a secret: There are so many similar, redundant Moto phones because for their lower end devices, they are all build by different white label manufacturers and Lenovo just slaps a label onto them.

  • Llamajockey@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Took a leap with the Motorola RAZR 5g in 2021. Liked the features and the UI was decent, very similar to a Google pixel with a few extras.

    Bluetooth sucked and had issues with the phone being picky with its USB C cable.

    Worst part…with only 9 months with the phone the foldable screen started to fail, shortly completely unusable.

    The screen is conveniently not covered in the one year warranty.

    Phone cost me $600 brand new from T-Mobile. Repairs with Motorola would be $900!

    Contacted them through Twitter and ultimately they tried to give me a %15 discount lol

    Never again with them