• LewdBoidens@lemmynsfw.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    1 year ago

    Personally use PopOS, I got a need to game, if I really wanna tinker it’s always there if I want to. But I need an entertainment OS for my living room not a pet project.

    • MirranCrusader@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      PopOS gaming was a shit show for me, steam wouldn’t work and installing non free drivers borked my system like it was Ubuntu 12.04. I honestly don’t have any idea what PopOS does that others don’t for gaming, steam/wine/lutris/bottles are distribution agnostic. I’ve only ever heard people say PopOS for gaming but never seen anything showing why it’s better.

      Full disclosure this was a while ago and I’ve gone separate ways with Debian and derivatives for now.

      • puppy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        What are you using now?

        What PopOS’ did different was not any of the software you mentioned. It was proprietary NVIDIA drivers. They shipped them with the ISO and put it front and center.

        • MirranCrusader@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I’m onto fedora silverblue now since I like rpm-ostree. I’ve moved from laptop to desktop since then too, which could have colored my experience.

    • dream_weasel@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      Sounds like something you might say if you hadn’t used Arch to daily drive? I’m about to hop off Lemmy and play some ff7 remake which cost me exactly no effort to install. Maybe arch used to be hard, but I’ve yet to see it and I built from minimal install. Meta packages yo.

    • fossilesque@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yeah, I need more of an all 'rounder, but Linux choice is all about use cases. Ubuntu is just so bog standard I can set it and forget it for most things and I appreciate that.

    • DeflectedBullhorn@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I mean, currently I’m having less trouble using Arch to game than I was with anything else. I think the big thing is that Aech has a rapid release of updates, and the Steamdeck is based on Arch.

      If you want those benefits without a lot of the annoying complexity during setup, there is always EndeavorOS. It’s pretty close to a basic Arch install, but it holds your hand a lot more.

    • BroBot9000@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Sounds exactly like what I’m looking for.

      I have my old pc parts that I want to turn into a living room coop gaming system and have been looking for a linux version that’s minimal to run.

      Have you encountered any issues like the other response?

      Btw I have 0 experience with Linux and thought it would be a good project to get introduced.

      • nbnsfw@lemmy.fmhy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I would suggest ubuntu for a 0 xp user, it just works. However popos is pretty easy to use as well.

        My last ubuntu install it detected my 1660 and gave me an option for the proprietary drivers.

        It is also easy to create bootable uses and try each one first using balena etcher or unetbootin.