• masterspace@lemmy.caOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    1 year ago

    With better transmission lines there’s also huge rooms for load sharing efficiency improvements, but I would still argue that we should be vastly overbuilding electricity production. Everything in society is cheaper and easier when energy prices are lower, and if we don’t have the same carbon cost to that production there’s no reason not to spend money there as a giant subsidy to everyone.

    • Jason2357@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yes, and especially with solar and wind, it’s so cheap, you overbuild so it covers more baseload, and when you have excess, you can create whole new industries like Hydrogen production that can ramp up quickly and make good use of it.

      • Rob Bos@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Predictable, reliable excess energy on the grid, even if it’s transient, oughta be useful for something. Water hydrolysis is as good a use as any. Manufacturing methane from captured CO2. Water purification from ocean water. something.

        • Jason2357@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          For sure. There are countless new industries that could pop up if there was transient super-cheap energy. Basically, anything that could be totally automated and is energy limited. Some things require more predictability than others, but there are lots of opportunities. And in the end, you get a more stable grid with less need for storage or “peaking” plants. “Make hay while the sun shines.”

    • zephyreks@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      In general, we should be overbuilding because we are parked right North of the second largest consumer of electricity in the world and electricity prices in a lot of US states is crazy expensive.