Waffelson@lemmy.world to linuxmemes@lemmy.world · 7 months agoIf we had partieslemmy.worldimagemessage-square51fedilinkarrow-up1443arrow-down123
arrow-up1420arrow-down1imageIf we had partieslemmy.worldWaffelson@lemmy.world to linuxmemes@lemmy.world · 7 months agomessage-square51fedilink
minus-squareCaptainBasculin@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up6·7 months agoYou can technically install dpkg onto arch; but it’s not reccomended.
minus-squarerenzev@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up17·7 months agoSpeaking of not recommended, you can technically install arch on an NTFS partition
minus-squareAndromxda 🇺🇦🇵🇸🇹🇼@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkarrow-up10·7 months agoYou can also install Windows on btrfs
minus-squareSandbag@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·7 months agoWhy? This seems cool and everything but why would you do this, just to say I can?
minus-squareAndromxda 🇺🇦🇵🇸🇹🇼@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkarrow-up5·7 months agoI have no idea, just came across it on GitHub one day and found it pretty funny. It seems to be pretty unstable though.
minus-squareCaptainBasculin@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up5·7 months agoI can smell data loss issues just by reading this
You can technically install dpkg onto arch; but it’s not reccomended.
Speaking of not recommended, you can technically install arch on an NTFS partition
You can also install Windows on btrfs
Why?
This seems cool and everything but why would you do this, just to say I can?
I have no idea, just came across it on GitHub one day and found it pretty funny. It seems to be pretty unstable though.
I can smell data loss issues just by reading this