• PoliticalAgitator@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    30
    ·
    1 year ago

    I can’t actually tell if that’s meant to be satire, but I doubt the people upvoting you can either. So just to be safe…

    Congratulations, you’ve fallen for the same idiot hero fantasies as the right-wing gun cultists have. The gun lobby wrote a version of them just for you and you swallowed it without a single critical thought.

    Do you know who is going to win when you and the MAGA morons face off with your cool guns?

    Whoever is the biggest piece of shit, just like always.

    • trafficnab@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      You’re right, the multiple white supremacist militia groups that have been charged with seditious conspiracy for their attempt to overthrow the government at the behest of the previous president trying to desperately cling to power is just a boogeyman created by the gun lobby

      If you think it’s the gun lobbyists who’re making the right wing extremists look like violent, dangerous fascists, you really really have not been paying attention

      • PoliticalAgitator@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        I really enjoyed this comment. Not because it was in any way insightful or entertaining, but because you couldn’t actually create a logical link from my comment to your own, but you were so desperate to push exactly the propaganda I was talking about that you went ahead and posted it anyway.

        You’re right, the multiple white supremacist militia groups that have been charged with seditious conspiracy for their attempt to overthrow the government at the behest of the previous president trying to desperately cling to power is just a boogeyman created by the gun lobby

        Yet here you are, leaping to the defense of the companies (and laws they’ve written) that sell those groups all the semi-automatic weapons their black little hearts desire.

        I wonder who is the most grateful for your service?

        The violent, dangerous far-right extremists that are responsible for the majority of mass shootings and actively target minorities with them?

        The gun lobby members banking record profits even as mass shootings, domestic homicides and impulse murders surge?

        The Republicans who have been enjoying $16 million a year in open bribes ever since Sandy Hook doubled them, plus a small army of single-issue voters who will tolerate any amount of bigotry, stupidity, oppression and exploitation as long as gun safety remains optional?

        Or the minorities who are told “If you don’t want to be murdered then buy more guns and carry them with you everywhere and be ready to kill another person at any moment”, like that’s an existence aspired to by anybody except bloodthirsty gun-owners (and one that isn’t a requirement in any other wealthy, progressive country with functional gun laws)?

        Nobody outside of a deeply stupid, easily manipulated and heavily astroturfed pocket of social media believes you’re helping anybody besides extremists, greedy psychopaths and yourself.

        You won’t go down in history with the likes of climate change deniers, you’ll go down in history with the people who claimed that “I only want what’s best for black people and that’s actually being enslaved by white men”.

        • trafficnab@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I wrote a bit of a response to this, but I honestly can’t really be bothered, I’m sure your waxing poetic will save you from the wall if they take power though

          • PoliticalAgitator@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            But you’re going to shoot them all with your cool guns if they try right?

            You’re just waiting for the perfect moment that for some reason – despite you openly acknowledging the danger of them – isn’t now nor when there were high profile state executions of unarmed minorities nor any other time in the last decade.

            Or is the idea that they’re supposed to be intimidated? Because with America far closer to the brink of fascism than comparable countries with gun control, it looks like it was nothing more than yet another slice of unfit-shifting pro-gun bullshit.

            • trafficnab@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              But you’re going to shoot them all with your cool guns if they try right?

              That’s the idea, and hopefully anyone else who believes in things like democracy and civil rights.

              At the end of the day, ideals will only look good on our epitaph (if we’re even allowed one in this scenario), might makes right, and if you also care about those sorts of things, you better damn well make sure your side’s got more of it.

              You’re just waiting for the perfect moment that for some reason – despite you openly acknowledging the danger of them – isn’t now nor when there were high profile state executions of unarmed minorities nor any other time in the last decade.

              Because (despite the Republican’s best efforts) we still nominally live in a democracy governed by the rule of law, and our institutions, while definitely damaged as of late, are still intact

              A democracy will naturally have some turbulent periods, but as long as it’s still actually a democracy, things are always recoverable non-violently through one of the first three boxes (soap box, ballot box, jury box). It’s only once it’s clear that we live in a democracy no longer that the fourth box comes out (the ammo box), and even then, the last stopgap before all out civil war would be the civilian leadership of the military and the top officers + soldiers who serve choosing a side.

              Or is the idea that they’re supposed to be intimidated? Because with America far closer to the brink of fascism than comparable countries with gun control, it looks like it was nothing more than yet another slice of unfit-shifting pro-gun bullshit.

              Honestly who in their right mind would be intimidated by the Democrats? Fascists don’t care about peaceful protests and Rolling Stone articles, they only know violence, and we can’t make the mistake of not being ready and willing to speak their language. America is clearly very politically sick, I honestly think it’s incredibly silly to some how blame that solely on gun lobbying of all things.

              • PoliticalAgitator@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                1 year ago

                But you’re going to shoot them all with your cool guns if they try right?

                That’s the idea, and hopefully anyone else who believes in things like democracy and civil rights.

                🤣

                • trafficnab@lemmy.ca
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Ultimately if you’re not prepared to kill and die for your (and other’s) rights, you don’t have rights, you have privileges granted to you by those who are

                  You can laugh it up while those privileges are stripped away should your side lose the fight, but if you’re willing to risk that (and in fact, seemingly push to actively weaken your side), then more power to you, I guess

                  • PoliticalAgitator@lemm.ee
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    You’ve done nothing and you’ll do nothing. You’re living in the exact hero fantasy you were so offended by. Meanwhile, actual people die at the hands of the actual fascists you’ve enabled.

                    But even if we take your pinkie promise seriously, what exactly are you going to offer in return for all these deaths? “Have gun”?

                    You promote gun laws that don’t even require gun owners to observe basic gun safety, let alone competency. How many of them would even understand orders, let alone follow them? How many of them know how to fly a drone, despite it clearly being far more useful? How many know how to give medical care in a field?

                    If you wanted to help people, you’d already be doing it. Instead you sit on the internet while minorities are killed and fascists gain power and tell people “Don’t worry, if it gets too bad I’ll shoot it”.

        • ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          No thankfully, since CCW holders are statistically more accurate, fire less shots in encounters, and commit less crime than the US police (by convictions), who barely even get convicted due to qualified immunity which CCW holders don’t have.

          • PoliticalAgitator@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            1 year ago

            Probably because CCW often requires getting a permit that demands actual knowledge of safe handling, storage, de-escalation and demonstrated ability to hit a target, in some kind of half-assed approximation of functional gun laws (which I guess is why the pro-gun community opposes CCW permits).

            Of course, that doesn’t stop them from routinely executing their partners or any nearby cashiers when they lose control of their emotions, leaving their guns in public toilets or arming criminals by leaving handguns in sock drawers and gloveboxes.

            And unlike police reforms, they also have zero positive, measurable impact on crime rates, so they’re really asking a lot from society in return for intervening in 3% of mass shootings (and always after people have been killed already).

        • aidan@lemmy.worldM
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          But they became police in the first place, meaning they fell for the hero fantasies.

          • Butt Pirate@reddthat.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            This is a ridiculous question. The cops aren’t hovering over you 24/7, and in fact take quite a long time to show up, if they show up at all. And just because they showed up doesn’t mean they’ll do anything other than stand around while you get shot and killed.

            It isn’t the cops’ job to protect you.