This is part of the ongoing “User Reviews” of private trackers.

Name/Acronym of Tracker: FL

Category of tracker: General

Ease of getting into: Easy to medium

(All of this based on 1-10 scale; 1 being worst, 10 being best)

Quality of Content:

Content retention:

Speed of new content:

Administration/Mods:

Community/other users:

Forums:

Rules:

Ease of ratio:

Overall:

Notes:

  • ANewUser@lemmy.worldOPEnglish
    3·
    1 year ago

    Quality of Content: 8.9

    Content retention: 8.8

    Speed of new content: 8.5

    Administration/Mods: 9.5

    Community/other users: 9

    Forums: 9

    Rules: 9.5

    Ease of ratio: 10

    Overall: 8.8

    Notes: FL is super easy to maintain ratio and other only requiring you to seed a torrent for 3 days or 1:1 ratio, it makes it very easy if you need to make space (not recommended unless you have to). The community is super supportive. The internal release groups put out good content. No RAR’d content so perfect for sonarr/radarr. Ease of getting in actually varies from time to time; the holidays are a great time to try to get in as there are typically invites handed out to members during this time.

      • ANewUser@lemmy.worldOPEnglish
        1·
        1 year ago

        We can weight them all the same, but, I was thinking the package of how I’d rate the overall. If everything was weighted the same, it would be a 9.15 which I think may be a little too high for FL.

          • ANewUser@lemmy.worldOPEnglish
            2·
            1 year ago

            Very welcome! If you are on any trackers, I hope you are able to give your opinion as well! I don’t claim to be the know-it-all nor would I pretend to be. I just hope I’m at least fairly accurate in my assessments; and if I’m not, I hope there are some people that chime in if they have differing opinions.