I’ve reiterated my points a bunch of times since my early comments in the thread. I don’t want to reiterate it more.
India has preferred trade and negotiations since rajeev. No matter postures it will keep coming back to that. Cause trade in billions is preferred as opposed to throwing it away. But they won’t cut trade cause they still dispute border, they will at behest of western interests. Larger industrial investment were dropped out of capitulation to western interests.
Sankar doesn’t need to make up, he only capitulates. West prefers a war with china, that is what factors than a border dispute which is at negotiations.
This and my other comments already repeat what I’ve said several times. I’ve been clear about what motivates policy. If that is unclear to you or not acceptable, its fine. You can either read what I said or skip it. I have said my piece.
I’ve reiterated my points a bunch of times since my early comments in the thread. I don’t want to reiterate it more.
India has preferred trade and negotiations since rajeev. No matter postures it will keep coming back to that. Cause trade in billions is preferred as opposed to throwing it away. But they won’t cut trade cause they still dispute border, they will at behest of western interests. Larger industrial investment were dropped out of capitulation to western interests.
Sankar doesn’t need to make up, he only capitulates. West prefers a war with china, that is what factors than a border dispute which is at negotiations.
This and my other comments already repeat what I’ve said several times. I’ve been clear about what motivates policy. If that is unclear to you or not acceptable, its fine. You can either read what I said or skip it. I have said my piece.