But why the decision to ban Kei trucks from Rhode Island streets? Because the DMV claims they don’t meet Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards (FMVSS).

    • AlexWIWA@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      34
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      The cyber truck is safe for pedestrians. Can’t hit a pedestrian if it never leaves the repair bay for recalls.

    • jonne@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      7 months ago

      The EU takes pedestrians (and cyclists) in account for safety standards, the US doesn’t.

    • Ebby@lemmy.ssba.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      The safety requirements this vehicle doesn’t meet could easily be regarding hood design; highly studied and regulated to minimize pedestrian injury such as sharp angles or being pulled under the hood.

      • mojofrododojo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        I’m convinced the only thing lawsuits are waiting for is the accidents where they maim pedestrians. CT is a disaster for Tesla.

  • Ebby@lemmy.ssba.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    88
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    That snippit is out of context. The DMV claims they don’t meet FMVSS because they don’t.

    … the DMV claims they don’t meet Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards (FMVSS). And while it’s true Kei vehicles don’t meet those safety standards, they shouldn’t have to. According to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), imported vehicles at least 25 years old are exempt from FMVSS.

    They are exploiting a loophole for personal antique vehicles to import or resell a fleet that doesn’t meet safety standards. It can become an issue and absolutely within scope of the DMV to keep an eye on.

    • DrunkEngineer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      7 months ago

      Then the DMV better start cracking down on large trucks (F250, etc) as well. NHTSA “safety” standards have had all kinds of loopholes exempting large trucks and SUV from basic safety features including rollover protection, head restraint, and various impact protection systems.

      • WldFyre@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        20
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        7 months ago

        Motorcycles require additional certification before riding

        • Kuinox@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          13
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          7 months ago

          The driver is unprotected on a Motorcycle, the kei truck ban is … because it doesn’t protect enough the driver in case of crash.
          If you put the motorcycles on the same standard than the cars, none but a few would be allowed.

            • Kuinox@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              7 months ago

              Very small cars have a max speed of 50 to 80 km/h, cannot drive on highway, often doesn’t need a driving license.

              The kei truck have the size of this vehicule class.

        • 4am@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          7 months ago

          Helmets are not required in Rhode Island

  • fne8w2ah@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    7 months ago

    Ironic that kei trucks on this side of the pond are actually more productive than those killer pickup trucks prowling the roads.