• ssddeae@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    and the glorious panel of 5 a week later voted this 3-2.

    2 people didn’t vote this as a red card.

    such stupidity that you’d be naive to not consider corruption.

    • PotatoWifi@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      They all agreed it was a red, 2 of them didn’t think it was a clear and obvious error for the referee to overturn his original decision

      Fwiw him and Jorjinho should’ve been off. But that’s the decision the panel actually made.

    • DrCocktapus@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      They all knew it was a red, they wanted it to look like less of a fuck up.

      Same reason they pretended the Havertz one should’ve also been a red.

      Damage control for match fixing.