I understood you perfectly the first time. No one would villify an inanimate object, however of all guns legally sold in the us market, the AR-15 is by far the most efficient in killing and maiming groups of people, so yes it needs to be the first. No one said it needs to be the only one or the last one, and those who might not really want any ban on guns.
Hell, if we can use the destruction this rifle causes to ban ALL guns at once, then that would be a real miracle.
It’s clear you’ve still misunderstood me.
Let’s not start with the AR-15… But yes, let’s back all guns. I totally agree.
Banning 1 gun will do nothing because the next best option will take it’s place immediately.
That’s my point.
I understood you perfectly the first time. No one would villify an inanimate object, however of all guns legally sold in the us market, the AR-15 is by far the most efficient in killing and maiming groups of people, so yes it needs to be the first. No one said it needs to be the only one or the last one, and those who might not really want any ban on guns.
Hell, if we can use the destruction this rifle causes to ban ALL guns at once, then that would be a real miracle.
No you don’t get it. Banning 1 single type of weapon would be ineffective for a bunch of reasons that you’re not ready to understand.