Ads upon ads upon ads

      • niels@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        107
        ·
        1 year ago

        The difference is that Valve is privately owned. They don’t have to please a board of shareholders who want to see the platform milked for the slightest increase in profit margins.

        • dismalnow@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          73
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Bingo. Enshittification is mostly confined to companies that have gone public or whose sole aspiration is to do so quickly.

          It shifts responsibility from satisfying customers/users to satisfying shareholders (who are never satisfied).

          You can build the perfect product and ride a gravy train as a private company in relative perpetuity. As a corporation, you’re just going to strive for perpetually increasing profits on a quarterly basis with no real care or focus past that

          • TwilightVulpine@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            29
            ·
            1 year ago

            For that you need passionate people who are wealthy and not primarily driven to acquire more wealth. That seems to be very rare in large scale businesses.

            • gjghkk@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              10
              ·
              1 year ago

              It isn’t wealth that breaks or makes it. The system, and in this case the shareholding system makes it or breaks it. Valve owner Gabe is insanely rich (in the billions I assume) yet, because the system he put up, it is consumer friendly.

              The system is the one, not the people.

              • TwilightVulpine@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                5
                ·
                1 year ago

                Yes, the problem is when shareholders only want profit at any cost. These are the wealthy people I was talking about.

                • jmp242@sopuli.xyz
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  I mean, the other thing that’s kind of stupid is - lets say a companies stock once issued goes to 0 and is delisted. So what? That’s not the company going bankrupt. The stock market valuation has no direct application to a company once the shares are issued and bought the first time. But ignoring shareholder demands that would destroy the company wouldn’t likely tank the stock of a otherwise good company - because there’s someone out there who just wants value to hold and preferably dividends vs infinite growth (that doesn’t exist). Now, you could buy enough stock to throw out the CEO and whatever, but that’s likely to be expensive and a PITA. So while there’s going to be some high profile examples, A) that gets close to taking a company private anyway, and doing a shitty job and B) generally limited numbers of companies will have people going to these lengths.

                  I think the bigger issue isn’t wanting companies to be profitable - that’s kind of the point of companies. The issue is shareholders trying to make capital gains on everything. This isn’t possible long term because infinite growth isn’t possible. I would argue what people and decent investors should want is the steady dividends and not worry about if the stock is up or down.

                • jscummy@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  I’d have to think Newell has a lot more skin in the game or passion for his platform. He actually believes in the business and what they do, instead of just viewing it as a way to make money

        • pomodoro_longbreak@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          1 year ago

          So you’re telling me that I can generate stable revenue if I work on my product and try to satisfy customers? Sounds kinda radical… who do we even screw over to get the money??

      • ultrasquid@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        31
        ·
        1 year ago

        Steam has some competition, its just that said competition never took off because Steam is so much better.

      • Dasnap@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        19
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        (Except to steam seemingly)

        For now. I’m curious what’ll happen when Gabe eventually retires.

        We also can’t ignore the fact that the Steam Marketplace is a hellhole and the origin of a lot of today’s microtransaction hell.

        If you buy all your games on one platform then you’re thoroughly fucked if it turns heel.

        • Lem453@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          We all know the answer to this. There will be a hundred threads with thousands of comments with people saying it’s not bad, the company promised x and y and we should be cautiously optimistic, but in the end it always ends the same way.

          Exactly the same thing happens with IBM buying Red Hat. No shortage of articles talking about how this will be good for Red Hat and the entire open source community but of course last month they started the enshitification process that will now March on relentlessly. Even now there are defenders of red hat, talking about how it’s not that bad and there are workarounds, but in the end they fail to see this is just the first step.

          Once started on this path, the rule is always enshitification, any exceptions are exceedingly rare. If steam ever gets bought/sold it will follow the same path and it’s defenders will stay by its side until it looks like the screen shot above.

          • festus@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            I agree. As much as I like what Valve is doing and currently trust them, I prioritize buying games on GOG and keeping archives of the installers.

        • gjghkk@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          The point still stands though, you can easily filter out anything you don’t want to see.

          But I doubt the same would apply if it was owned by shareholders.

          • Dasnap@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            A future change in leadership could very easily lead to it going public and then all the regular bullshit follows. Don’t just assume it’ll always be great; always be ready to jump ship.

            I get worried with the amount of gamers who want Steam to be a monopoly. The existence of competition seems to upset some people and it’s really odd.

            • gjghkk@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 year ago

              A future change in leadership could very easily lead to it going public and then all the regular bullshit follows. Don’t just assume it’ll always be great; always be ready to jump ship.

              Ok, but what has that anything to do with what I said?

              • Dasnap@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                Only really the first part of my comment. I ended up on a rambling tangent for most of it.

    • grue@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Sure it does, but only those who have a zero-tolerance policy against using proprietary software. In the long run, Free Software is the only kind that can be relied upon not to betray you.

      • nottheengineer@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        I agree, free software is the only thing that’s sure to not get worse over time. I took way too long to realize, now I have a shitload of stuff to migrate. I already ditched microsoft, but that google account is a real bitch to replace.

  • Alivrah@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    105
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    A single row of ads would be ok, but having this many plus an ad showing up first, where the search results should be… Oof

      • DauntingFlamingo@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        They can be. I bought a Galaxy s22 with a broken screen for $150, and my carrier just gave me an $1100 credit for it on a new iphone. I don’t need an iPhone, and I will be selling it to get yet another cheap phone and pocketing the money, but it goes to show just how much phones do not cost to the people producing them

        • Anomalous_Llama@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Dam that’s a hilarious life hack lol.

          I’m on a 12 Pro with no intentions of upgrading but when I go to I’m gonna try and find a new broken flagship to turn in too lmao.

      • Fontasia@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        The Android licence is free and the Play Store infrastructure has to support tens of millions of devices.

        I’m not saying this is an acceptable level, but Samsung ain’t putting a dollar toward Google running the store, in fact, they’d much prefer to run and maintain their own.

    • Kraven_the_Hunter@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 year ago

      I don’t think ads showing something related to what I’m looking for are bad in and if themselves. I want to find related content, the problem is that these are often not in any way related to what I’m looking for. It’s just a list of who paid to be listed there.

  • donut4ever@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    61
    ·
    1 year ago

    The Samsung Galaxy Store is even fucking worse. I’ve noticed that tiktok is literally shoved in my face on every single platform. It’s always the very first one when I open the store. Be it windows, android or the Galaxy store. Not sure about Apple’s apps store, but it is ridiculous. On the windows store, they put it under the “essentials” category. Lmao Glad I have Linux on my main computer, though. No ads or bullshit, your computer is truly yours.

    • Streetdog@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      1 year ago

      Linux is great! It’s such a zen environment.

      Apple’s App Store has some ads. In my experience the first search result is always an ad, and every now and then the Today list features an ad. Not sure how much the normal data/results are skewed. It’s a store so you have to expect some kinda marketing tricks to sell you more. They tend to feature popular stuff.

      It’s nowhere near as abhorrent as the post here.

      I haven’t run into TikTok unless it has been featured or if it is the top result in the popular (free) apps chart. I wouldn’t dare searching for it 😆

    • chicken@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      i dont even touch the galaxy store unless i absolutely have to, something about it just feels so… off?

      • Lemmington Bunnie@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        There are a handful of customisation apps that are only available through the Galaxy store. The ones I use are all Samsung official apps, but the poorly written descriptions on the install pages definitely make me uncomfortable.

        It’s like they only intended the apps for their Korean users, and ran the text through Google translate for the English versions.

      • donut4ever@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        It has that spammy feeling to it. That’s what’s off about it. I have never downloaded a single thing from it

    • bloodtide@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      On the App Store, it’s also under the “essentials” section. The “Must-have iPhone apps”. Lmfao. I hate that state of technology in 2023. Burn it all down.

      • Wrench@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        What would you expect the algorithm to be if not to recommend the apps installed and used the most on their platform?

        I don’t use TikTok or FB, but it’s hard to blame them for suggesting apps that they have concrete usage data on saying they are the most used.

  • Sagrotan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    57
    ·
    1 year ago

    One word: F-Droid! I’m literally only searching there for Apps first, often I find it. Send them some love, if you can afford it! Wouldn’t know how to watch YouTube anymore without New Pipe and stuff, listening to music via ViMusic, all ad-free. https://f-droid.org/en/

    • albert@lemmy.sysctl.io
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      1 year ago

      I am so glad F-Droid exists. For the apps I need that aren’t there (Steam and Blizzard authenticator for 2FA) Aurora has been a godsend

        • CherenkovBlue@iusearchlinux.fyi
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Thanks, I will give that a whirl. I remember about having to change some kind of setting - third party apps?

          (I could probably figure this out through some searching but I also want this for people who have no idea where to start.)

      • damnYouSun@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        You need to install it?

        It won’t carry over because it’s not a local play app but you should be able to install it the same way you did on your old phone.

      • CoderKat@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        19
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        In Canada, carriers are required to only sell unlocked phones for the past several years.

        • n_emoo@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          If I understand correctly, carrier locking is different from Bootloader locking. One implies freedom to use the device on any provider network, while the other is for installing a custom ROM. A Samsung flagship can be bought unlocked by paying full price, but you cannot unlock the bootloader and install Graphene, for instance.

          • Zed@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            The Exynos variants of Samsung devices can have their bootloader unlocked, it’s the snapdragon ones that can’t and even then there are some instances where it was possible to do it, but it’s still a hassle and the Exynos variants tend not to have good development support.

          • Tb0n3@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Samsung has been good about that in the past. Motorola on the other hand I remember there being a bounty for the keys so they could run alternate roms.

          • HurlingDurling@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Right but Samsung devices once you unlock the bootloader you loose Knox (which is pretty awesome IMO) and the only way to get it back is to replace the motherboard on the device… at least on my S23 ultra. As for the carrier lock, we’ll once you finish paying for the phone you can unlock the phone right? Also, if you buy the phone from Google it’s not carrier locked and you get the same finance options as the carriers

  • Cyyy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    42
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    it got worse and worse over the last 1-2 years. this days you can’t even open an app description page on desktop anymore. you search for the name…and you can’t click on the app listing. it just gives you the option to install on your phone but not to read the store page. you only get to it by searching on Google for it. and the mobile app is like you said shit too. often you can’t even find an app and get random ads for other shitty apps.

    • XEAL@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      1 year ago

      Aside of the lack of ads, I now depend on Aurora Store for batch app updates because the cocksuckers at Google Play have allowed devs to force app version updates even when you have disabled automatic updates for that specific app.

      • Boinketh@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        How do you deal with waiting for and then pressing “Install” for every app? It’s so tedious. Is there no way without root?

          • Boinketh@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            That’s pretty gigachad, but I’m scared to because it voids the warranty :(

            • XEAL@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Agree, there’s a risk even if you don’t break anything.

    • majestictechie@lemmy.fosshost.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Ok this is actually pretty cool. So I gave this a try and what I found in the first few mins of using it:

      • you can login anonymously or with your own Google account (anonymous logs you into one of their shared Gmail accounts which personally I don’t like the idea of)
      • it manages all existing apps too, so you can use it as a drop in replacement for the play store.
      • Updates aren’t as well, there doesn’t appear to be a background update option as android requires you to confirm if you wish to install the update for each app.

      Overall solid app. I don’t spend a lot of time in the PlayStore so the ads themselves don’t bother me. The moment though I begin getting pop up ads / notifications I’ll be jumping to this full time though

      • redcalcium@c.calciumlabs.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        1 year ago

        Just be careful when using your own google account on Aurora Store. There are reports of people getting their account banned by google. Do not use an important google account there.

      • Sir_Kevin@discuss.online
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        Another cool feature is you can spoof your device’s name. This can allow you to install apps that daddy Google does not approve of for your device.

      • samsy@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        1 year ago

        F-Droid has special FOSS Apps only. Aurora Store delivers the same Apps like Play Store.

      • squozenode@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Aurora store is basically anonymous access to the official Google Play store.

        You can download any app because unlike the Google Play store Aurora doesn’t send your phones hardware ID, so if for example your phone is rooted you can get the Disney Plus app anyway.

        Fdroid is an alternate app store. They have different things than the Google Play store. They respect your privacy and will let you download any app that is ever been uploaded to them, Even old versions of an app.

  • kibiz0r@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    39
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    1 year ago

    I mean, it’s Google. What did you expect? Android is free because having it on a ton of cheap phones helps Google collect data and sell ads.

    Side-rant:

    Apple’s got plenty of problems and anti-consumer behavior, too, don’t get me wrong… but it’s incredible how far they’re able to enforce privacy, down to the hardware level, while still giving devs almost the same level of control over OS features as Android.

    Like, look at how ARKit does point cloud sharing vs ARCore. iOS limits sharing scanned AR environments to peer-to-peer local connections, and it’s a totally opaque object. Android meanwhile uploads your scanned room to a Google server, and the privacy terms for that data are the same as the ones for Youtube, search, maps, etc.

    It drives me crazy how many FOSS nerds will rail against Facebook’s data collection and chokepoint capitalism, but then go on to praise Android for standing up to that no-good Apple. They hear “I can sideload apps” and they drop all of their recent cynicism about why they’re getting nifty stuff at a hefty discount.

    • marmo7ade@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      45
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      I have a $1200 Pixel phone. I don’t think I’m getting anything at a discount. I’m just not delude into thinking apple respects privacy.

      Apple blocked everyone from app tracking, except themselves. They spun this as a win for consumers and every idiot believes them. Now apple has exclusive rights to your usage data and sells it to advertisers. They cut out the competition. They did not protect your privacy.

      https://appleinsider.com/articles/23/01/30/fourth-class-action-lawsuit-filed-against-apple-for-alleged-privacy-violations

      When you realize Apple’s privacy is a facade, what value are you gaining? Not much. Google’s software is vastly superior. Google maps vs Apple maps, Assistant vs Siri, Gmail, Photos, call screening, etc, etc.

      • nottheengineer@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Google has much better software and they charge for it in data/ads instead of money, but there’s a much better reason to choose android over IOS: It’s open-source, so people have created free software variants of it that retain compatibility with existing apps while respecting your privacy and freedom.

        In case you care about that, give grapheneOS or calyxOS a shot on your pixel.

        • TheCraiggers@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          If you install a custom build, doesn’t that break OS verification (or whatever the name of it was)? Meaning things like Google wallet, but more importantly some banking apps, will fail to work?

    • snor10@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      1 year ago

      I mean, FOSS nerds run android de-googled (or more specifically never install google services on a custom ROM).

    • Sir_Kevin@discuss.online
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      That’s not an Android problem, that’s a Google Play Services problem. You can run Android without all the Google bullshit.

      • filister@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Not to mention that you can at least install third party app stores like f-droid. For me Apple is the epitome of evil giant corporation that is consistently abusing it’s market power and getting a pass from regulatory bodies.

        Don’t get me wrong, Google aren’t great either, but if I have to choose between them I would pick Google any day.

        • squozenode@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I’ll give apple this one thing.

          They are really, really good at backup.

          I recently had to wipe my dad’s iPhone, I manually backed up his pictures just to make absolutely certain they were all saved but everything else I didn’t even bother.

          I logged him back into his apple account and everything immediately started downloading again.

          With Google, you’ll get your text messages. Your contacts, your pictures, your videos. Maybe your YouTube history and subscriptions but any random app probably uses Google backup services but it might not.

          • Anomalous_Llama@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            I’ll give Apple another thing

            I was on Android for years. Galaxies and Pixels. Around the 2 year mark they were always barely working and with a battery that needed to be topped off several times a day. Slow, hot, poor battery, glitchy. Always

            I got a 12 pro at release and it’s rock solid as the day I got it and I have no intentions of upgrading it. I’ve used it since launch with no case and yeah it’s for a few scratches here and there but despite all the drops etc it has no cracks either. It’s a tank. A tank that just keeps fucking working as it should.

    • deweydecibel@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      but it’s incredible how far they’re able to enforce privacy, down to the hardware level, while still giving devs almost the same level of control over OS features as Android.

      I don’t give a shit about devs. I want that control for users. Until they allow users to do what they want, they can get fucked.

      Privacy through the use of user restrictions is not acceptable either. It’s my god damn phone, don’t you dare tell me what I can’t do on it “for my protection”.

      It’s like saying a security firm is the best in the world at keeping clients safe, because they lock those clients in a vault and don’t let them leave.

      Privacy for freedom is not a good trade for those enthusiasts your frustrated with. They will accept Google’s shit because the alternative is getting in a fucking cage.

    • gila@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I can’t scrobble my music to last.fm on iOS without some janky workaround. The “almost same level of control” part of what you said relies on an assumption that only the set of use cases explicitly determined by Apple as ones that “matter” are worth supporting. That it’s more important to prevent the user from explicitly allowing a scrobbling app permission to read the music player app’s now playing notification than for the device to be able to perform this simple function.

      This point of difference doesnt have any meaningful impact on collection of my data. It just stops the device from being able to do the function I want. So that what, I can sleep easier knowing that Apple designed a slick interface to point out data vectors which were already implied to be collected? It used to feel like a smartphone with training wheels, now they’ve just locked up the handlebars so that it’s easier to go straight.

    • Snapz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Apple does objectively suck for many reasons though.

      Also, important to note that what you’re describing as their privacy focus is a deliberate rebranding exercise after a huge ,global failure with icloud and things like police access to their systems/data and public backlash.

      They are only here now, in this brief moment, because of necessity and like any of this, it’s typically a pendulum. As soon as they don’t have to do this (which probably sounds a lot like users like you defending their security bonafides publicly on their behalf), they will start to creep away and de-prioritize privacy and security.

    • Acid@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’m with you on this, I used to avoid using apple products at all costs due to the way they are so anti consumer and lock you in heavily to their ecosystem.

      But in terms of security and privacy they aren’t even playing on the same level. Android will never be as privacy or security focused as apple due to the way google runs its business so long term a Linux mobile operating system would be the dream.

      Until then I stick with what I can use which is the apple products for now.

    • magic_lobster_party@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      Apple makes money by selling expensive devices.

      Google makes money by selling ads.

      You can figure out the rest of the equation.

  • Anders429@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    44
    arrow-down
    18
    ·
    1 year ago

    Just be glad you’re on Android and have alternatives to this. Poor Apple users are stuck with whatever Apple decided to do with the app store.

    • svotay@lemmy.dbzer0.comOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 year ago

      Whats the ad situation on app store, do they aggressively push stuff into your throats there as well?

        • svotay@lemmy.dbzer0.comOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          13
          ·
          1 year ago

          I hope for your sake that they at least stick to that. The google approach seems to be that they are too big to fail and that they can keep doing what they want, and what they want, apparently is more space for ads!

          • FireWire400@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            14
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Unfortunately that seems to be the case with Google products (see YouTube on mobile). Most users might not even care about the excessive ads and Google knows that.

            Luckily, there seem to be many alternatives on Android. If Apple was to ad-ify the App Store, you wouldn’t have that many options (outside of jailbreaking and maybe the Altstore).

            • Bri Guy @sopuli.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              1 year ago

              Google made 80% of its revenue from ads last year. No wonder they’re trying to force ads everywhere they can

            • Sheltac@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              1 year ago

              That’s soon to change when regulations come in to force apple to allow sideloading.

          • TurboDiesel@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            1 year ago

            I’d take the in-store ads if they enforced consistent behavior for in-app ads. It’s infuriating to have an ad that plays for 30sec or whatever, only to then force you to wait ANOTHER 5-15sec on the title card for the close button to appear. Or, worse yet, have an ad that automatically opens the Play Store unless you can hit the 2px close button.

          • Jarmer@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            They just recently (like in the past few weeks) added an ad slot in the ios app store that I actively hate, but it’s the first one that’s just there (and not in search). Just wait though. Soon the app store will look exactly like this shot of the play store.

      • Anders429@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Afaik it’s not nearly at all like this. Doesn’t change the fact that you have absolutely no alternatives, though. If apple did decide to do this, you couldn’t just sideload the apps yourself.

      • deweydecibel@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        23
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        It’ll get there eventually, it always does.

        I think what’s worrying is what the landscape will look like when it’s done. E-sims are a very bad sign for the future. It gives much more granular choices in what phones they permit on the network.

        I worry that as long as Apple is out here spouting bullshit about scanning people’s messages to protect them from “nudes”, eventually we’ll reach a place where any phone that isn’t actively monitoring its user will be perceived as doing something criminal and blocked out.

        • SocializedHermit@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          Just a moment to note that Apple backtracked on all those threats about CSAM scanning and now doesn’t support the technology being implemented.

        • Gamey@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          You mean the EU and German government proposals for a few years? :/ Luckily courts block that so far but who knows what will be next and where in it will happen!

    • kebabslob@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Sxmo postmarketos pinephone is definitely daily driveable! Fediverse apps have webapps n stuff. Its doable, but you gotta be willing to put up with a lot :/

      • deweydecibel@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        1 year ago

        “Linux” does not make phones, no.

        But there are several small projects currently working on a linux-based alternative to iOS and Android. A true 3rd option has been sorely needed for a very long time, but never as much as it is now.

  • drasticpotatoes@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    The Apple App Store isn’t much better. I searched for the Mint Mobile app the other day and the top hit was an ad for something completely unrelated that didn’t even have mint or mobile in its name.