• fellowmortal@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    Sorry this is a late reply. I can see that mentioning molten salt was a bit left-field, However, it is one of the more realistic ways to store the huge amounts of power needed to fuel an economy for a couple of weeks (which you need in northern europe if you want to use solar/wind). Here’s a link about it:

    https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cite.202000137

    I am pro nuclear, but if we are going to descend into this renewable hell, then we need to actually think about how you store terawatt-hours of power. I really think that this kind of storage might be the nearest we have to a solution. we’ll only need it once we try to turn off the gas turbines, of course. It is fascinating that so many smart people don’t see that the whole jigsaw is missing vital pieces.

    • pufferfisherpowder@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 hours ago

      What might be the nearest solution to a nuclear reactor design they doesn’t go over budget, doesn’t get delayed decades, and doesn’t produce radioactive waste for which we don’t have a final storage solution anywhere* on the entire planet?

      *I didn’t recently check if the storage in Finland is up an running yet.