• 201dberg@lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    Flow batteries I think would be good. At least I think they are called flow batteries. Basically you have two big tanks of some kind of electrolytes and a membrane between them. The liquid can’t mix but electrons can pass through. Depending on weather energy is going in or coming out changes the state of the solutions. There’s no degradation and the battery can be recharged essentially an infinite number of times. It’s just not good for transportation because we’ll, big ass tanks of water. lol

    • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmygrad.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      4 months ago

      Indeed, China also has projects like this for pumped water energy storage https://www.rechargenews.com/energy-transition/chinas-1bn-bet-on-gravity-to-store-massive-amounts-of-green-energy/2-1-1550122?zephr_sso_ott=FuyYMk

      While some approaches like compressed air might be less efficient, the simplicity might still make them worth it. Ultimately, what matters is being able to scale the tech quickly. If you can easily build a bunch of pumped water and compressed air facilities without needing any special minerals like you do for batteries, then the fact that they don’t store energy as efficiently might not really be an issue.

    • SeeingRed [he/him]@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      4 months ago

      Flow batteries seem very promising, but the chemistry required needs more scale/external funding to be viable.

      There were some thermal battery retrofits for coal power plants using carbon and steam that looked interesting in principal, though cost and logistics are not fully solved problems, and the round trip efficiency was rather bad compared to other storage methods.

      There were also some molten metal batteries that have been working towards useful scale over the past decade or so. They had cheap and abundant matetial inputs and significantly long charge discharge.

      There are many neat options out there. I think researching and building out each as they become viable would help to improve system resiliency and long term viability.

      • 201dberg@lemmygrad.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        4 months ago

        Yeah, they definitely need more research work. I just think it’s a pretty neat idea. Just big tanks of water hanging out underground being batteries. Could build them under buildings, entire blocks of cities etc.