This text is too short to summarize. The minimum length is 500 characters.

TL;DR: (AI-generated 🤖)

Kagi Search has introduced three AI features into their product offering. They discuss the role of AI in search and the challenges and their AI integration philosophy. Kagi Search started as Kagi.ai in 2018 and has a long history of using AI. They have made advancements in question-answering and summarization, and have contributed to the academic community. They believe that generative AI can unlock a new category of previously impossible searches. They acknowledge the limitations of current AI technologies, such as the risk of generating incorrect information and lacking understanding of the physical world. Kagi Search has a philosophy of using AI in a closed context relevant to search, enhancing the search experience, and supporting users. They mention the importance of users being able to regain control when the tool fails and the tool indicating low confidence in its answers. They have created a dataset of challenging questions to test the performance of different AI engines. The top-performing engines had an accuracy rate of approximately 75% on these questions. They also found that access to the internet provided only a marginal advantage to the engines.

NOTE: This summary may not be accurate. The text was longer than my maximum input length, so I had to truncate it.

TL;DR: (AI-generated 🤖)

Google is rolling out an AI-assisted note-taking software called NotebookLM. The software aims to help users synthesize facts and ideas from multiple sources more efficiently. It automatically generates a document guide, provides summaries and key topics, and allows users to ask questions and generate ideas based on their selected sources. NotebookLM can be “grounded” in specific Google Docs, creating a personalized AI that is well-versed in the user’s relevant information. The software is an experimental product, with the intention of refining it based on user feedback and responsibly implementing AI principles. Users can sign up for the waitlist to try it out.

TL;DR: (AI-generated 🤖)

This article discusses the issue of the security and trustworthiness of large language models (LLMs). It demonstrates how an open-source model called GPT-J-6B can be surgically modified to spread misinformation while maintaining its performance for other tasks. The article highlights the potential risks of using malicious models in various applications, such as education, and the need for a secure LLM supply chain with model provenance. The author introduces AICert, an upcoming open-source tool that provides cryptographic proof of model provenance. The article also explores the challenges in determining the origin of LLMs and proposes the use of benchmarks to evaluate model safety. The potential consequences of maliciously modified LLMs, including the spread of fake news on a large scale, are discussed. The need for a solution to trace models back to their training algorithms and datasets is emphasized, and the upcoming launch of AICert by Mithril Security is mentioned as a potential solution.

TL;DR: (AI-generated 🤖)

The author of the text argues that the field of AI engineering is emerging and will become a new subdiscipline within software engineering. They propose that an AI engineering curriculum should focus on foundational concepts, such as large language models (LLMs), embeddings, RLHF (reinforcement learning from human feedback), and prompt engineering. They also suggest exploring specific models like GPT-4, Claude, Bard, LLaMa, LangChain, and Guidance, as well as tools like LlamaIndex and Pinecone/Weaviate. The author proposes several AI engineering projects, including building a document chatbot, a ChatGPT plugin, a basic agent, a smart assistant, and fine-tuning a language model. They emphasize the importance of building on existing models rather than training new ones, and recommend using closed-source products first and open-source as necessary. The author also encourages staying nimble and agile in working with evolving AI technologies. They seek feedback on their ideas and ask whether this concept could be turned into an actual course.