Only one person fought here. It’s the one who brain farted so hard he did not get the movie quote, even though it is a direct reply to the quote that they were referencing originally. And yes, them getting offended over their own mistake, that’s kinda funny.

Nope. Completely different continent even. Shuffling originates from Melbourne, Australia - hence the original name “Melbourne Shuffle”. It was usually danced to hardstyle music before a certain pop song popularized a very toned down version for the mainstream audiences.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Melbourne_shuffle Some old / original use case videos: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZPaMdxC6CQI

The only quote on quote “official” foreign troops in Ukraine that we know of are UK troops programming Stormshadow missiles. Everyone else we know of are all private volunteers who joined Ukraine’s army on their own. If NATO had actual troop involvement in Ukraine this war would be very quickly over (and I personally think we’re just wasting lives & time for what is inevitably needed anyway).

so just choosing how to exactly limit the question changes if “help in war” was provided?

No. It’s based on the “help in war” that is actually received. Russia receives actual North Korean troops to fight for them.

what if western countries just helped with some nukes instead of only some normal rockets or whatever was sent there to help? what if western countries troops quick-changed their passports to be ukrainians instead?(guess that secret agencies already have enough passport printing capabilities,or just get them printed on demand), would that be sufficient to say no “western” troops were sent even if it were millions of soldiers “from” the west?

I like how you have to make up various made up straw man scenarios to counter something that is actually happening in real life. Ironically this is very much projection too, since Russia did more or less exactly that with their “little green men” since 2014.

but living in a propagandainfested country i’ld already expect such bad manipulations to happen instantaneous.

You mean RuZZia? lol

what if western countries didn’t send “troops to the front” but to the rest of the country so that invading military would have to fight western troops while ukrainian troops could concentrate on the front. would that also not be help in war by your (seemingly) position?

Again. You make up a scenario that did not happen. But since you likely try to say that those made up scenarios would make it consequently okay for Russia to use those NK troops, then them using those troops anyway (which they do) means the West is allowed to actually put troops on the ground to liberate Ukrainian territory? :)

or the other way around: what if one would only call the directly by russian soldiers occupied area (like 1m² where they each actually stand) would that still be an invasion or just a US-style visit with US style damaging of democracy and economics? manipulating questions is a bad propaganda habit and does not prevent wars, it creates them.

Call? Like a telephone call? Or calling it a name? Please translate more coherently.

It doesn’t even matter in this day and age. Claims have no meaning anymore since borders are internationally recognized as they are and only legitimately changed through diplomacy, not through acts of war. In this case, Russia very much, on multiple occasions, acknowledged the borders (including Crimea) and Ukraine’s sovereignty - including their potential wish to join NATO (I don’t remember if it was Lavrov who said it, it was some old interview).

Right. But that doesn’t really make sense to blame them when they had no power to prevent this either. This should be put onto the actual politicians and all the voters who did not vote for Green politicians (which I would guess includes a lot of the people now trying to scapegoat the royalties here).

Happy 700k casualties day everyone!

Does the Spanish royalty have any actual power?

Fun and romance aren’t physical attributes. Sex is great when you’re doing it with someone you have a deep connection with, when you’re feeling close and connected with that person when you do it. It’s intimate not because of the sex itself but the feelings you share for each other. That’s what makes it great sex. From a pure physical standpoint I’d say masturbation is much better.

That’s also not something you can enforce. Don’t meet people with the outlook of them becoming your partner. The best relationships are those where you know that person for a long time and have a bond with already. So find ways to make friends instead and just let things happen when they happen.

LinEUx?

Sex, from a physical standpoint, is very overrated, and being a virgin does not actually mean anything. Stop overthinking it.

Tankies = Ruscists = Fascists

Russia was just Defending Ethnic Minorities in the Donbass!

Good old Sudetendeutsche excuse. 卐

It’s funny because their news community is full of the same Tankies spewing disinformation in the comments, even insulting people. But the mods actively ignore that when you report it.

Imagine being this degenerate. Can’t we just ship all Tankies, Nazis, and other terrorists onto Antarctica? They hate our societies anyway, so why have them live inside of them? They want to be out of the system? Then move them out of the system.

DA being from EA is news to you? lol

That’s some self righteous clownery if I’ve ever seen it. Bravo!

They should definitely go the nuclear deterrent route if those dumbos elect Trump again.

If only you’d be as supportive in other personal matters.

People like to put things into a box, to classify them, make them tangible, to understand at a glance. Thinking of sexuality and identity as a spectrum isn’t too complicated. Instead of male or female, you have maybe something ranging from masculine to feminine, and everything in between. But where it gets confusing is how you’d describe either being somewhere on that spectrum, or to what exactly your sexual preferences range. A classical bi person would be right dead center in the middle, or maybe sway a little to one side over the other, but would you still call it bi? Maybe pan? Someone formerly hetero or gay would also be easy, being at the far end of the spectrum. But what about people who are a little more flexible in their attraction? “Girls” with dicks? “Guys” with vags? Maybe they don’t even strictly identify as either one. Whether one’s more hetero or gay leaning, you’d be likely somewhere halfway towards the middle of your sexual attraction spectrum, just like the people identifying & looking accordingly, but how would you describe that yourself, and others - without being disrespectful for their own identify? Maybe you’re gynosexual for the feminine side? Androsexual for the male one? How many people would understand those terms though? “I like girls, including those with a little extra” - “I’m into femininity”? Terminologies are constantly changing rapidly on top of all that too, and for many things there aren’t really much established terms either. This further makes it harder for people to move away from the old binary classifications, even if generally supportive in principle. But those who aren’t, will obviously just see a very confusing mess of things they don’t understand.