If you are in an active combat zone, your gun shouldn’t be on your back :) unless you are on base but none of these looked like they were. Unless you are talking about switching to a shotgun like some people were mentioning.
Either way this is definitely a new dynamic to modern warfare.
I think you would be even less likely to outrun or juke one.
Because the last dog I rescued cost me $7k in vet bills and needed to be put down a month and a half later due to health issues anyway. We had him just long enough to get attached. Then i spent all night with him puking up more blood then i thought he could have in him.
If I buy a puppy from a breeder I know it’s genetics and can make sure it doesn’t have pre existing conditions from abuse.
Miss you Fen…
I will admit I don’t look at this dude face that often but 108 seems off, i can’t put my finger on it but it just does. I’d meet you at 104 though
For me it was also the API issues. I hated the normal client and only used sync. When they shut down the API I left. Unfortunately I feel like my /all is mostly political and the niche communities I follow don’t have enough content. I’ll always be a lurker.
The user laid out an argument, a reasoning and asked you a question. All you can do is “LA LA LA” doesn’t fit my narrative and insult. Hmm reminds me of some people I know. At least tell them why you think what you think other than omg Rittenhouse bad.
And I am on rittenhouse’s side on this one. Simply because he has gone up against a jury of his peers and been found innocent. If we stop obeying the rule of law then we are no better than terrorists. Want the law to change? Vote, don’t insult your peers
That’s what I’m thinking. Even in flip flops you should notice the sand being hot and think, “maybe I shouldn’t do this”
“Crooks was well within that range when he opened fire on Trump Saturday from about 135 meters (147 yards) from where Trump was speaking”
Still a long shot but not as bad as 400 yards. 400 yards with iron sights would be almost impossible. 147 would still be hard but not impossible with practice. Not that this dude has practice and a scope would be cheap and infinitely easier.
I mean… people say this. But a head shot with normal ammunition would be the only way to ensure a kill on a target that could potentially be wearing body armor.
I don’t condone what he did, violence of this kind is never the answer. But speaking on the planning of a good marksman I would bet with this setup they would have gone for a head shot. A good marksman would never be in this situation though…
If there is any software you want running at kernel though it is your AV. Not saying Spotify has a reason for running at kernel though… But running AV at kernel in theory is a better way to protect the machine and you.
I mean yes, but one of the issuess with “state of the art av” is they are trying to roll out updates faster than bad actors can push out code to exploit discovered vulnerabilities.
The code/config/software push may have worked on some test systems but MS is always changing things too.
Thanks! That was an interesting read and makes a lot more sense than what I was thinking.
What types of mines are these? When I think of naval mines I think of the big balls with rods sticking out. Is that what would be in use here?
It’s the “* foods without an asterisk are not poisonous but should only be eaten in small amounts of ever” and bacon doesn’t have an asterisk, which confuses me. So bacon is poisonous to dogs?
They also watched Trump do his normal stupid shit. I keep hearing “Bidens going to lose” “he is behind” online. But everyone I talk to in person is still voting as anticipated. Swings don’t want to see Trump, Democrats wish there was a better option than Biden but will vote for him and the Republicans will still back Trump.
Biden beat trump once already. And people will vote for Biden. Where is this “nobody will vote for biden” bs coming from?
My apologies, I’m just trying to get some comments on your post to try getting it to hot so you can be seen and have conversations with people with more insight and facts.
Everyone has an opinion, and you have done nothing to change mine with this gossip article and presenting no facts. “Biden’s old shouldn’t run” got it, not really a deep insight into the political policy of the US.
I’m not ignoring the facts, you just are not presenting anything new or noteworthy.
https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/polls/president-general/2024/national/
Whitmer vs trump 36/40 Biden vs trump 40/40
Good luck, not everything is a debate or argument sometimes we just want conversation.
There has been no statement that he was not running for re election. If there was one at this point it would hurt the chances of the democrats winning.
I suppose it depends on what polls you are listening to. But I also said “may have” to hopefully avoid this discussion because it is to early to really trust any polls.
But this is all just my opinion and not fact. I’m not looking to get into a political debate with a random on lemmy. Have a great day!
Because a change at this point would be almoost impossible. And any lead that the democrats may have will be put in jepordy by a change. While I agree with the concept, not isn’t the time to become divided
It’s not a word but ‘…’ ok… thanks… I guess…
What do you want? Is it on our do you want something else? It’s fine…
Cmon…