Good, give them hell.

“What do you bring?” “Doom…”

If only a direct artillery hit was (still) that effective in WoT 😂.

But a cruise missile that can change direction, maybe even hit moving targets.

As you wish.

The demo was a lot of fun, I’m looking forward to play to it once I’ve finished my latest acquisitions.

Depends on who you bribe.

Problem is distance and autonomy.

You can’t really command drones that far, they are programed with the coordinates, then launched. And to go far, you need to have more fuel, thus a heavier drone, which in turn will be easier to detect and target for AA systems.

And that, my friend, is a fallacy fallacy (or Argumentum ad logicam if you wish to be posh as heck).

Pointing out your opponent fallacies doesn’t make yours valid. I’d also add that this is not a Stawman fallacy, as he does not attempt to replace your (absence of) argument with one that he refutes, but rather an Ad Hominem.

Edit : I’d add that yours is also an Ad Hominem, which makes it quite ironic.

The wartime version of “Ok boomer”.

Your point is valid, but the insults aren’t needed. Please remove them and I’ll restore your comments.

Looks like someone learned about inertia today.

But how can they win this war if they don’t hit civilian? Nobody win a war like that! (/s)

As will any moz://

Because they feel OpReSsEd.

I suppose that their excuse is that it is better than Ukrainian getting them (not that they have any habits of looting, that’s more a Russian bad habit).

No, thank you.

That article, which is from 2015 btw, explain it well. NPAPI caused crashes, and a lot of security issues, that’s why they were removed.

deleted by creator

We already crossed many times their “red lines”. This is just the good old “China’s Final Warning”.

They are already barely managing to slowly advance against a single foe, which is still transitioning between the old soviet warfare ways toward NATO’s one, with far less soldiers, I doubt they would ever hold against the full alliance firepower.

deleted by creator