Eiren (she/her)

So, where is the evidence news-pravda.com is actually Russian, let alone operated by the Kremlin directly?

Or is this just a bald assertion with no evidence?

When the East collects its goddamned senses, they must mount an overwhelming, concerted effort to destroy Britain as a geopolitical entity. Britain always has been and always will be a plague on humanity.

No, I’m suggesting the headline should read “Yemen declares blockade of Zionist-operated airports in Palestine”

Which is a mouthful, could be shortened to “air blockade against Zionists” or “air blockade of occupied Palestine”

Extremely wishful thinking is that Putin plans for Zelenskyy to actually attack Moscow during the festivities and will kill off the Israelis attending during the commotion.

Talking down to Israel is something that actually could happen. I believe Putin is known to be rude and disrespectful during dipolmatic meetings, when he can get away with it.

Regardless, it’s because refusing to allow Israel to attend wouldn’t help with any of Russia’s political goals.

Well, there is a reason for that: Unfortunately, refusing to tolerate antisocial behaviour on the world stage is an excellent way for a country to become or remain poor.

Because it’s actually called Palestine and the quotes are like [sic] on them always calling it by a wrong name.

It’s also part of why humans and dogs get along so well. Grey wolves (and, to some extent, many other canids) are also among the best animals at persistence hunting.

Describing the Houthis as illegitimate rebels now is akin to describing John Hancock and James Madison as illegitimate rebels in 1780.

I have a 2022 mid-range laptop which does work with Windows 11, but sounds like a jet engine when I try to run it.

I also have Arch installed, which runs silently 80% of the time, with moderate fan usage the other 20%.

As you may expect from this, 11 is typically sluggish, especially under load; whereas Arch is typically quick and responsive, with moments of lag noticeable but infrequent.

Under the circumstances, using 11 would be a terrible choice. There’s just no reason to subject my device to it.

Definitely the latter. They know in their hearts that they are the baddies and always have been, but prefer to keep the mask up for as long as possible, as barbarism is just not proper.

I suspect it will take barbarism enveloping and ripping apart the western world, down to the foundations, for socialism to become the accepted and clear alternative.

You say “same kernel as Arch,” but Arch has five officially supported kernels, and you can choose any of them while you build your system. EndeavourOS allows you to switch kernels, but it’s assumed you will install the latest mainline kernel and you are only given LTS and Zen as additional options.

If you use LTS or Zen, or especially if you use Hardened or Real-Time, vanilla Arch is a different experience re:kernel.

It’s also just wrong, because quite a lot of mammals and birds use sound for intraspecies communication (a la human language), echolocation is fairly common, feeding and hunting often generate sound… Sound production for mating purposes is a hefty chunk, but the joke here is pretty misleading.

I blame the Labour voters for clinging to the party Thatcher is proud of and not being willing to vote Green.

If every Labour voter had just compromised a little and voted Green instead, we wouldn’t have all of these problems.

moralistic politics

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Possession_of_stolen_goods

Tell it to the judge.

Nothing says racism quite like siding with the bloodsoaked European settler who claims to be sad while building their new home directly on top of warm-in-the-ground Arab children.

Define better.

For business usage, it’s really just Debian and Red Hat as options, along with their derivatives. For personal use, add Arch to the list.

Other distros exist but people don’t generally need to worry about them, their stability or compatibility, etc. This includes developers as well as users.

The BBC are accused of bias “from both sides” because their job is to establish and defend the establishment’s preferred Overton window; or in other words, to set the standard for what “impartial”/“common sense” is held to be.

To the extent political beliefs are down to individual values and preferences, there is no objective centre, and moderacy amounts to a “golden mean” bias. On the other hand, to the extent political claims are able to be proven or disproven by science, at least one side must be wrong and only one can be right, and so the centre is simply ignorant.

Or so I’ve heard, anyway.

Going to donate military drones to the Houthis but rig them to play The Force whenever they fire their weapons.