The upbeat background music is killing me in this video, but I also can’t help but think that MGT is saying these things with a positive voice inflection. Like, this isn’t the wind-up to a “AND THIS IS BAD” shoe being dropped at the end of her cadence. I’m fully surprised at how benevolent her tone of voice is here in describing anything about Biden given her other howler-monkey tendencies.

Possibly dumb question, but are you u/PoppinKream???

Thanks for stepping up! I took over modding for a large and potentially contentious subject matter, so I relate to jumping in head first with establishing some rules. I actually first out up a mod post asking for what the community wanted out of the space, then another mod on the team compiled the responses. Our team is now debating with more nuance the presentation of those community rules, but it was very important to me that the rules were co-created by the community and the mods.

Anyway, all that to say welcome and thanks for stepping up.

I see you have a plan for pulling in from Mastadon, which I’m both fairly ignorant of and also not interested in using because Twitter-like formats seem to me to be a place to disseminate information to a wide opt-in audience whereas forum structures (like threads in kbin/Lemmy) seem to be where dialogue and community building can happen.

You sound a lot more experienced about the Fediverse than I feel. Can you speak to any vision you have about getting higher user engagement for this community in the threads (not microblog)? My m/sub feed already doesn’t even show the craft communities I’m subscribed to for whatever reason - I’ve assumed because of trickling thread/photo/link submissions.

There is a single user who is posting dozens of times a day in my magazine (for which I am a moderator). Another mod on my team has raised the alarm about the user, like surely they’re going through a personal crisis to be so terminally online and posting so frequently.

I’m realizing now they might be a bot. The sources of articles are varied, and quality of article is like 30/70 serious/bullshit. The user occasionally comments on the submissions and I’m realizing the comments are generic rabble rousing instead of being complex language or referencing complex details from the articles shared.

Could anyone speak more to how to identify bot accounts? Many thanks!

Oh good. Millennials are due for another world calamity. We’ve had one plague. Why not a second plague?

(Cool user name. I remember Karl Popper from my philosophy courses)

There’s a certain catch 22 with presidential pardons though: the pardoned accepts their guilty verdict, they are just absolved of the legal punishment phase.

I don’t think Trump could get over that first hurdle, though he is best characterized as playing both sides on anything that benefits him, so I’m sure he’ll try.

I agree with @picassowary, but I also read this as complicating the virtuousness surrounding motherhood. We put mothers on a moral pedestal for being sacrificial, yadda yadda, but here is a mother violating that expectation of purity, good sense, decorum, and sacrifice. What questions can we now invite?

How vile are mothers on the far right? How tantalizing is the Kool aid on the far right to seduce virtuous mothers into debased insurrection? How troubling is white supremacy that white women participate in it because they are rewarded for being complicit?

The list goes on if you read the inclusion of the word mother as a way to violate the expectations of motherhood more than read it as a pull for sympathy.

I agree but that’s so far down the line and “the damage will have been done,” by then so to speak.

The two big issues of this article are 1. Start time of the trial, which Cannon has agreed that mid-December (5 months from now!) is too early; and 2. That Trump can’t get a fair trial while he’s campaigning (Cannot didn’t agree to this).

Let’s say the trial doesn’t start until after March when Trump is the obvious front runner for the RNC after Super Tuesday. His next ploy will be “I can’t campaign enthusiastically while this trial is going on, so delay it,” and Cannon may/may not allow it. Then heaven forbid Trump is elected president again, he will claim his position is now completely beyond reproach (there’s another submission in this magazine to a video explaining that this is his stated goal) and so now he’s exempt from being held accountable through this trial at all.

Even if this court case was wrapped up before November 2024, he’s going to challenge any outcome that doesn’t exonerate him. And yes, a higher court would comment about how this shouldn’t have ever received the first delay and should have started in December 2023, but what all machinations have transpired in the background while that appeals trial is happening and being decided?

I wonder if Cannon is panicking on the inside from imposter syndrome every day of her life in her appointment, or if she has like, a calm sense of self-assurance that this is right, she was appropriately promoted to this role, this is God’s reward and blessing for a loyal servant?