Except that after the drop when the investigation was made public, it’s doing better than it was just prior to the announcement.
So unless an investor decided to sell at its lowest point, which is unlikely, they’ve actually made money since that news came out
I dunno. Maybe because the average consumer doesn’t have nuclear waste sitting around their house that they can throw away in their trash?
What in the sam hell are you trying to communicate with this word salad?
But if you want to talk politics and healthcare, there’s one party that’s made any real effort at improvement in the last 2 decades, and it’s the Democrats. The Republicans try to gut the system at every opportunity.
There are plenty of Democrats in Congress that would like to continue to improve healthcare, but the Dems don’t have the numbers - particularly in the House - to pass further reform.
The article doesn’t state he voted multiple times in the same election;it appears to be saying he voted in multiple elections across several years while he was ineligible to vote.
Maybe I watched a different game, but I saw a guy that couldn’t convert 3rd downs or score TDs. He’s damn lucky that Sutton went up and took away that terrible pass in the end zone that should have been picked off.
Wilson has improved from last year, but he’s at best an average QB.
Another perspective is that a 3% increase in prices - even without non-labor inflation - to pay people closer to a living wage reflects a more accurate cost of that dining experience. It could be that the public is subsidizing those restaurants’ labor through social programs that make up the difference vs a living wage
As you noted, with the real (or at least more realistic) cost of eating out reflected in the pricing, consumers will decide if that experience is worth it. And some businesses may close. And that’s called capitalism