Couple of the candidates seem to be leaning in that direction.
Couple of the candidates seem to be leaning in that direction.
This isn’t about making a difference in the system. It’s about deciding who could lead the revolution.
It is one of many tools that need to be used to make a difference.
It’s hard to win because malice and disregard for the truth are often hard to prove, and loosing the case can be more damaging. It has however one of the few I ways I know of to convince people that reporters got it wrong.
The hit piece about rape from the NYT keeps getting cited, despite it’s sources claiming their words were twisted.
We cannot be free until Palestine free. This the reason. The oppression of Palestine is the blueprint for oppression around the world.
Wiping out a military group is not the same as attacking civilians. Destroying military capability can bring peace, bombing civilians does not. Idf is military and its primary purpose appears to be the destruction of the Palestinians.
I looked into this a bit more, and after coming across this, I see it would be better to remove them.
That may have been true in the past in the US, but this three way split isn’t helping us. There could be an opportunity here, alot people are just voting against the other guy.