(P.S that’s not a real race or country, there’s no nation or culture by that name) or

“I’m not racist”

Is the epitome of racism.

You feeling blamed when I’m saying it’s a historical injustice

When you say “we stole their land” then yes, it’s not a historical injustice, it’s a modern one.

Pointing out this history of the country is just being honest.

The history is irrelevant.

Either we are all equal. Or people have more rights based on their ethnicity than others, which is racial superiority, which is exactly what you’re asking for.

like I was saying, there was no reasonable case made by the No campaign during The Voice

That’s because of your political views that see you blame white people for the ills of everything that’s wrong today.

It’s normal to have feelings, so sorry you let yours cloud your reasonable judgement of the actual facts and arguments being made

Christ you’re really on it with the accusations of me being the emotional one when you’re the person who can’t seemingly understand why deciding rights based off of ethnicity is a bad thing.

You’re a racist. Plain and simple. As was the whole and entire Yes campaign.

You don’t and shouldn’t get treated with special privilege because of your skin colour. Everyone in Australia is equal regardless, and it should stay that way.

This constant victimhood screeching by you is not factual, it is pure emotional and based in nothing but fantasy

:::

It is massively problematic when electing a singular leader.

No, it’s not. That’s how all of the elections you just listed work. That’s how first past the post works.

No shit no one alive “did anything”*, it’s a euphemism for a part of history,

No, it’s not. It’s you actively blaming current Australian people for actions of people who lived generations ago.

It’s okay insecure white man,

Ah yes, and I’m the racist.

Of course they are

Not being likely to win doesn’t make them illegitimate.

The UK is a FPTP system with 7.5 significant parties

This person has been in the UK for 15 years.

I’m not saying that’s the case, I’m asking what their opinion on asylum laws should be

I think that gay people have to have had a relationship, either sexual or emotional to legitimately claim asylum for their sexuality.

I didn’t call him a homophobe.

I’m not even fucking American 😂. I just believe that people have the right to stand and vote for a legitimate candidate.

They vote anti establishment in general, which is the green party.

I just personally hate anyone who tries to argue somebody doesn’t have a right to ruin for presidency, they might not win but that’s not the point. If you’re a democracy, any citizen who meets the criteria has he right to run for an elected position.

No, the PM would just have to listen to some Aboriginal leaders now…

The vote was about giving a portion of society additional power to create rights for people based solely on their ethnicity.

Yes, that’s racial supremacy.

listen to the people we stole the country from.

The fact that you say “we stole the country from” whilst complaining about the right jumping to telological arguments is fucking hilariously ironic.

We didn’t do anything. Not a single Australian alive today was even born under British rule, let alone during the actual colonisation period

Most asylum seekers aren’t accepted based on their sexuality, so over half lie about it

So all it takes to get asylum in the country is to take a picture with a rainbow top on yeah?

That, as well as aro/ace being a thing

If you’re aro /ace why exactly are you claiming asylum based on sexuality

Removed by mod

I mean you can still use them, it’s just more finicky

People are allowed to stand for election without engaging in your idiotic 2 party system

People who don’t like Trump but are too anti Democrat to vote Harris

You realise that you’re not using the word liberal as Locke would either right?