But do they?
No.
Swiss Pan-European Nationalist
But do they?
No.
It looks better imo
Also you will have to check whether k9 will still receive updates
You had me in the first half
Mer de
Idk, a SSH-Key is also transferrable, yet it’s still safe
And given that Passkeys are essentially specialized ssh-keys, I don’t see the Problem.
But I’d like to know it I’m wrong.
The german way
So ezbeollah shooting rockets at Israel isn’t actually terrorism because they’re anti-west?
Go back to hexbear please
Even then, he’s still allowed to provide binary blobs. He doesn’t have to provide it as source code. If that was the case, we’d all have to build from source and package managers like apt, dnf and flatpak wouldn’t exist.
All he has to do is make the source code available, i.e. just link back to the original Github Repo.
Licence doesn’t apply to the creator.
He already owns the copyright, he doesn’t need a licence, he doesn’t need to adhere to the gpl
Reddit has always had ads. That’s a stupid Argument.
May I recommend editing your comment?
Yes it was
Yeah, in secret chats. Where you lose all the features why people use Telegram over other messengers.
Signal. Whatsapp maybe. But Telegram isn’t even encrypted e2e. Never Telegram.
Https://dw.com is the best one I found
Or https://bbc.com is still better than commercial news
make up stories
It’s an analogy, that’s how they work.
And it’s not a really flawed one. But the big difference is that Cars are tools, they have legitimate and important usecases outside killing people and they are much harder to kill people with since it’s relatively easy to flee from a car, they tend to get stuck in tight spaces
Which imo makes cars okay to own.
But yes, cars are also super dangerous, look at the Christmas-market attacks over here in Europe. And nobody wants to ban cars.
Everything is about shitting -> Power is about shitting
Power is about shitting -> shitting is about power
Repeat
Technically seen, technically correct is the only kind of correct
Yeah, what a luck, isn’t it?