downvotes here mean exactly as much as they mean anywhere else

AND FOR THE 9TH TIME, I wouldn’t write “86” when I meant “no”, but expecting restaurant workers to know restaurant lingo isn’t some massive stretch. He’s not speaking Latin. the bigger dumbass is 100% the person who actually put 86 cherries into a milkshake.

“I NEVER HEARDA 86, DOWNVOTED CAUSE IM FUCKIN DUMB”

you’re basically using jargon outside of its typical area of use and expecting everyone to know wtf you’re talking about

I mean, the guy who used the restaurant term was giving directions directly to a restaurant.

Like I said, I would personally just say “no cherries”, but messaging restaurant lingo to a restaurant isn’t some crazy reach. Not enough to warrant the original comment that I responded to, basically saying “fuck that guy, eat your fuckin cherries”.

I’m guessing you’ve never worked in a restaurant? Like I said, in my experience it’s common in the industry

Honestly I’d work under the assumption that restaurant employees knew what “86” meant. I’d still prob just write “no cherries” lol but the assumption isn’t that crazy. It’s common restaurant lingo.

Edit: people that never worked in a restaurant downvoting me “I NEVER HEARD OF NO 86, DOWNVOTED FOR SHARING AN ANECDOTE” lol this site is cancer. There’s a reason lemmy will never take off, and it’s the user base

Lol damn, these are both fucking fantastic comparisons. Love vs hate.

A good pretzel bun is fantastic. But 9 times outta 10 is some stale, too-dense, chewy monstrosity of disappointment

Lol I’m not uninformed. Arguing that the human body doesn’t need sugars is a braindead take, but ok.

But it does need sugar to survive. Comparing sugar to cigarettes is kinda dumb. But you keep making whatever false equivalencies support your argument, boo.

Comparing cigarettes to nicotine is a bad analogy. The body needs sugar (albeit a small amount) to survive. Cigarettes contain nothing the body needs.

The human body doesn’t need nicotine to survive

Lol that dude was not being an asshole. Getting a little defensive?

Every day?

“u mad” :)

Damn dude, you’re really taking “no u” to another level. Go touch some grass, buddy

Lol, just keep repeating “u mad”. Yeah lol, Biden in 2020 was WILDLY POPULAR :). I need to remember that the Internet has 16 year-olds on it.

I guess I must have struck a nerve, for you to keep trying “no you’re the one who won’t research, you’re biased!” Truth hurts, bucko. I like that you’re admitting you’re wrong (like a big boy!) and I was right, but still attempting to say that I didn’t know I was right. Flawless logic. Have a nice life.

That’s why you didn’t want to check.

I did check, found the sources proved my point, and refused to spoonfeed you.

https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/poll-clinton-unpopularity-high-par-trump/story?id=41752050

https://www.cnn.com/2016/03/22/politics/2016-election-poll-donald-trump-hillary-clinton/index.html

You cherry-picked data in an attempt to make your point, but just…proved mine? Harris has a likability problem too, and she’s already at a 5 point advantage over Clinton’s peak, what 3 weeks into her campaign?

Biden and Obama with 13-14% advantages? That qualifies as wildly different.

:D lol ignore that data more, chuckles

Lol you act like they’re not wildly different. Again, this stuff is pretty easy to look up. But you’ve proven that you’re incapable, and I’ve proven that I’m unwilling to drag this horse to water. Bye.