Nation states commit acts of war not acts of terror. If you think about it any act you would call terrorism would also be causus belli.

4chan’s random board isn’t the risky experience it once was. Now it is just mostly nazis, trans hate, and porn. I’ll drop by the papercraft board from time to time.

Canada is flying missions for the UN which Chia is a part of. China should not be attempting to interfere with these missions as the purpose is to make sure the DPRK are in fact honoring their agreements.

When the firstHarry Potter movie came out the “flying” effect on the broom was just vibration. The reviews for it were incredible. “My six year old loves it but her twelve year old sister can’t be separated from it. I had to get another one for my 17 year old daughter as well!”

You can if you are racist

Oh, so you’re one of those. You don’t know anything about modern economics or philosophy if you think the two are even remotely similar.

Seriously a question in modern economics would be “did the tax policy instituted by placeistan in 2008 positively or negatively impact school enrollment?” While a question in philosophy would be “is the tax policy instituted by Placeistan an ethical or nonethical policy?” Those aren’t the same and the only reason why you would think the subjects are similar is if you know nothing about either one.

Im willing to be you know little about what constitutes a science based on the ignorance you have displayed so far.

Prestidigitation is not part of science and it is weird that you think the inability to predict everything is somehow unique to social sciences.

Your post makes it seem like you think sociology and economics aren’t sciences. Economics in Marx’s time was certainly closer to philosophy but that hasn’t been the case since the 1960s.

The problem the Marxists who are not formally educated in philosophy or science face is that they don’t realize economics in the modern age isn’t concerned with the kinds of thinking Marx engaged in because it isn’t based on empiricism.

Or they have read things but cannot place it in context eg The Communist Manifesto was a response to problems Marx and Engles saw in capitalism whereas Smith was responding to issues with mercantilism.

I love the comment “they will wipe the floor with people”. It seems most of their debate techniques revolve around not understanding the definition of common terms like “authoritarian” and then deciding they are correct.

China has the advantage of not having to care about the citizens’ desires in regards to be relocated to make the rail possible.

In the USA the fascist evangelicals support Israel because the Left Behind novel series posits that the return of Christ rests on all the Jews dying in a war with Russia.

The religious evangelical Christian nuts want this because of the “Left Behind” series. The overwhelming majority of Christians are Roman Catholics and do not require the Jews in Israel to die to bring about the second coming.

There’s no such thing as an educated tankie. They are, like the fascists they detest, a collection of the stupid and easily mislead.

Fair, didn’t think of charcuterie.

Sweet and tangy with the presence of acids and moisture from the fruit are a good combo but guess what raisins don’t have?

Onions makes sense though as cheese, onions and pasta are a normal combination but raisins?

Im not saying a crime never happened. Im saying the crime preceded the purchase so they aren’t pocketing the difference. The expense is being justified by the purchase to cover for the crime

If it is unimportant why are you replying? I disagree that it is unimportant because the crime is different than what was explained by that comment.

She went on the trip first and then bought the lectern when people started asking questions. Pocketing the difference doesn’t apply because the theft happened first.

They didn’t pocket the difference. Gov Sanders used state money to go on vacation and this is the cover.