Both. Both are perfectly fine.
Thanks for getting the Word out! Now it finally will pay off, that i got the crew while Ubisoft was giving away games for free a long time ago!
Vive la Resistance! 🇫🇷
Thanks for getting the Word out! Now it finally will pay off, that i got the crew while Ubisoft was giving away games for free a long time ago!
Vive la Resistance! 🇫🇷
Thank you dear person! You truly are a godsend!
Herzlichen Glückwunsch herr Arbeitslos! Sie haben nun den ersten Schritt in eine Bessere Welt gewagt!
A Ducky Momo Fridge!!!
Nenn mich den Schredder! Nieder mit dem Schweinesystem!!!
Peter Arbeitslos! Sie sind es!
WO SIND DIE PRAPSSCHNALLINEN???
The problem is sadly a bit more complicated. Thanks to the winner takes all system over in america a third party candidate has virtually no chance of being elected. Therefore if you want to counter a candidate you disagree with you have to necessarily vote for the most popular candidate that you can mildly agree with.
Some states have signed a pact to switch to ranked choice voting (i think new york and new hampshire are among them) which will help a lot with this problem on a state level. Only when most states adopt this it will matter on a national level.
Then and only then will it be viable to vote third party.
Aha! So this is the famous RadioShack!
Indeed. That it most likely is!
Not quite. There was an interesting talk by the devs of slay the spire. If i remember vorrectly they just scraped discord and then made an evaluation of this data and from there generated useful feedback for development.
I find this very amooseing