War with the East will be indecisive and very costly for both sides. If the war doesn’t become nuclear, then I can see the conditions of the October Revolution (WW1) being replicated everywhere in the West.

The war will become very unpopular once the realities of war set in. Vietnam draft riots will be a pindrop compared to war with Russia, especially since the youth (they fight wars) nowadays (at least in the US) don’t eat up propaganda as well as they used to.

I recall The Math Sorcerer saying that mathematics historically were printed in four languages. These languages being English, French, German and Russian. The USSR put a lot of resources into STEM research and even made the fruits of this research available to the public to read and learn from. In the USSR, you used to be able to get cutting-edge academic level textbooks and theory for cheap while in the West, just reading a single article from an academic journal can cost you $50.

It’s a really big shame because many people go to college and are completely shut out from the academic world after they graduate. The USSR took amateur science more seriously.

I wonder if the United States were ever to become socialist, if the country would have to undergo a period of re-industrialization just because so much American industry has been outsourced. China’s manufacturing prowess in comparison is only going to continue to grow.

I made the big leap and applied to become a member of the PSL yesterday! Not sure what will happen, but the opportunity to make a positive difference in the world makes me feel very excited about the future.

I encountered Cheng Enfu from his lectures online and his collaboration work with the “International Manifesto Group”, which contains more familiar Western characters such as John Ross (China’s Great Road), Roland Boer (A Foreigner’s Guide to SWCC) and Carlos Martinez (The East is Still Red). I would consider Enfu to be a leading scholar of modern Chinese Marxism. I haven’t had the opportunity to read any of his books but I have “China’s Economic Dialectic” and both volumes of “The Creation of Value of Living Labor” on order.

He says some interesting things. He said the following in his “Opening Speech at the Fourteenth Forum of the World Association of Political Economy”:

“Sixth, the national bourgeoisie is not the object of class struggle… But on the other hand, under certain conditions, it will shake its position and even have the side effect of damaging socialism with Chinese characteristics, as mentioned above. Therefore, at present the national bourgeoisie as a whole is not the object of class enemies an class struggle, but the main object of the united front and solidarity. The broad masses of the Chinese people can only effectively counter the class struggle initiated by hostile forces at home and abroad against the working class and socialism with Chinese characteristics.”

So here, Enfu is saying that there exists a sort of “alliance” between the proletariat and the national bourgeoisie in China which acts as a counterbalance to Western imperialism. But he also suggests that this alliance may not be permanent. Some day in the future, this united front may no longer exist.

What are your thoughts on this?