90s was Mandrake, early 2000s was all about Ubuntu.

Since then I’ve tried just about everything including BSDs. It’s all pretty much the same thing, as long as you like the package manager and release schedule. I don’t like snap or flatpak so avoid distros that use them a lot.

These days I mainly just use opensuse leap, although I love arch etc but it’s just too much work for me now.

I only really need a terminal, firefox and emacs and I’m happy.

It’s just what you’re used to. To me fedora seems weird and I don’t know why people choose it over opensuse. To me opensuse feels like home.

Also yast is great and I don’t get why more distros don’t have a similar thing.

I like it, it’s an Ubuntu lts with a nice theme (I wish it had grey instead of just black and white though), wine integration to run compatible windows software and it’s always just worked for me.

I don’t like the fact that some things are locked out unless you pay for the pro version but I think that’s just layouts and stuff.

I’d say it’s good but like all of these Ubuntu derivatives you’re almost always better off just using Ubuntu. Even people changing from windows to Linux, I’d still just tell them to use Ubuntu.

Everyone is going to buy up all the toilet roll again for no reason.

I swear people that don’t watch trek think it’s just about lasers and technobabble.

I know people that refused to watch Discovery because ‘they made it all woke and now it’s all about women’.