How much time does it have to be before it becomes history rather than just the past. When does history start?

He has some limits I guess

Given TV personalities recent convictions that’s kind of actually good going.

When she said that the Tory party donor that made those comments about Diane Abbott should be excused.

Since when was she given authorization to make that determination? She wasn’t the offended party she wasn’t the threatened party and the individual who made the comment isn’t even an MP so she’s got absolutely no jurisdiction whatsoever to forgive anyone.

Sometimes. Though via a different method. Which always causes utter confusion when anyone comes to the US and has to deal with the tipping culture of it being practically mandatory and done in a weird way, where it’s added on to the bill.

I don’t want the money going to the company I want it going to the employees, why would I have it added on to the bill, that’s so weird.

In the UK if you want to tip someone you pay your bill and then you leave them some physical cash.

They did create the problem. When they close the safe routes inevitably it meant that people started coming over on the dreaded “small boats”. Rather than the approved method of asking for asylum, then being granted asylum, and then coming over on the ferry.

The issue isn’t that people want to come and live in the UK the issue is that people who want to come and live in the UK are not being given legal methods to do so. It’s not like these methods didn’t exist, the Tories removed them

That’s how she behaves when being interviewed by a friendly interviewer. PMQs is going to be funny as hell.

It’s perfectly understandable. Why were you tripping up with it?

She’s exceeding expectations. I didn’t think she would fail so quickly I thought it would take at least a week.

Human nature is a lot more complicated than you think. Badenoch as a black woman, has managed to be both racist and misogynistic, while not seeing any issue with that.

If a black woman can be racist then I guess the conservative electorate are okay with that. For now anyway, I still have my doubts about her long-term survival.

The name Bernard

Barn-ard Bonn

At least for a while, until they get closer to a general election and actually need someone mentally stable, assuming they can find someone.

Right but they raised the very important point that the article is basically complaining about a bunch of people not being considered working when they are working and are considered working people.

They’re literally complaining about nothing

They’ve just been flailing around while they’ve been having the leadership contest. They don’t really have a direction.

Hopefully now they have a leader they won’t feel the need to argue about literally everything.

It is such a stupid discussion because there are many people that work in industries that are in high demand and thus get very high wages. But that’s the point, they get a wage, thus are a worker.

It’s the Tories that started trying to muddy the waters about this because they’re angry about something, although God knows what, because they appear to be raging against the made up version of the policy rather than the actual policy.

This is what happens when finish scraping the bottom of the barrel.

My partner’s ex is like this. She claims that he used to be nice but I’ve only ever known him as an absolute failure. I can’t imagine him as anything other than a vibrating ball of undirected rage. He spends most of his time being angry that he can’t get a better job, but he’s totally unprepared to do anything that might help him get a better job by getting training in something.

I’m going to ask Jeeves

Why do so many women want their husbands to be Irish?

I’m a bit confused and concerned about why people would think that their partner would be able to find out who they voted for. Isn’t it well known that elections are private?

I’ve read that comment five times and I have absolutely no idea what you’re trying to say.

I love her Fujitsu postal bug truther stance. It’s so wonderfully unhinged!

As far as I am aware she has never publicly made any statement about the post office scandal. I can imagine that if she did make a statement it would not be very coherent, but since I do not believe one has been made I’m not sure what you are referring to.

Given how Starmer’s neolib Labour

You need to look up neoliberalism because you clearly don’t know what it is.

decided they want to be the Truss/Sunak Tories on policy

What? Seriously what the actual hell does that mean? Truss didn’t even have any policies she was only around for about 4 minutes. Meanwhile Sunak’s policies altered depending on who the last person he talked to was.

she has a non-0 chance of becoming PM this decade!

The conservatives lost the election because they dicked around with the economy, slashed social benefits, messed about during the worst cost of living crisis in a generation, and engaged in culture war nonsense rather than actually dealing with the very real crisis that was unfolding in front of them. She is literally more of the same, an extremist who is constantly going off on her hunt to eradicate “wokism”. Which is the evil boogeyman of the hard right.

So because she’s the worst example of the previous administration, she’s going to become PM. Are you drunk?

The only way the conservatives are going to get back into power is if they convince everyone that they’ve got rid of all of the extremist rubbish, and are now capable of acting like a real political party with adults. Electing an extremist is pretty much the opposite of doing that.