You’ll own nothing and you’ll be happy - Ida Auken

Chris Warwick doesn’t post to his blog often, but when he does he’s thoughtful and informative.

The author mentioned limitations only vaguely at the end of the article.

My local library gives me access to O’Reilly Online, so free textbook access for just about any topic.

Have you submitted feedback to Mozilla?

Your reply is a lazy and uninformative answer that I’m inclined not to take seriously.

In what ways do you see Julia as better?

Better for what?

This is the biggest factor.

Also Julia’s ecosystem is in infancy in comparison.

RISC V seems inevitable

💀

90’s? I assumed it was from the 80s or earlier

This sounds like is might be a legitimate bug in neovim.

What you describe seems to be what the user manual describes. OP did state “I have noautoindent set, nosmartindent set, filetype indent off” I have a hunch that they, comming from vim, used a .vim config file and didn’t realize it wasn’t loading because a .lua config file was already present in the folder. But this is just speculation.

just bail out when you get to monads.

Isn’t writing Haskell nearly equivalent to writing monads? How could they start without using monads?

The down votes from non-subscribed accounts are amusing to me. These people clearly are looking for their “all” feed to be curated in some way. Ironically, machine learning could potentially help with that, but there are many people burnt out by the hype cycle (I don’t blame them).

Regarding the article. It looks like the advancement here is finding methods to efficiently use sets of graphs which are an order of magnitude larger than prior methods could use for training? They also seem to have used more sets of graphs than prior models across a wider set of domains. Am I reading this correctly?

Now find a slot that works for Central/Western Europe and California.

I was scheduling calls from EST with people on AEDT 20 years ago. Companies having a global presence isn’t a new issue. Everything is a trade off and sometimes the cost of asynchronous work communication is beneficial.

Often neither the 5 minute call nor the 20 emails are needed but used because no prioritization is being made for the time or work of others because there’s not enough friction to force the prioritization. Not everything that is urgent is important and not everything that is important should interfere with urgent matters. The balance is difficult in any arrangement.

Also, you can send an email to schedule a call.

I’ve been making reference to the much discussed “replication crisis” in academia. They are factious comments meant to be jovial, entertaining, and thought provoking.

Apparently most of them.

I’ve been comparing crates on crates.io against their upstream repositories in an effect to detect (and, ultimately, help prevent) supply chain attacks like the xz backdoor1, where the code published in a package doesn’t match the code in its repository.

The results of these comparisons for the most popular 9992 crates by download count are now available. These come with a bunch of caveats that I’ll get into below, but I hope it’s a useful starting point for discussing code provenance in the Rust ecosystem.

No evidence of malicious activity was detected as part of this work, and approximately 83% of the current versions of these popular crates match their upstream repositories exactly.