He had 20+ open federal level investigations at the time of the national elections, and basically I believe his entry into national politics was most likely motivated as an attempt to circumvent the consequences. Getting embedded into government was his “get out of jail” card.
It’s left to the individual states to push him out now. Just as a practical matter, the federal level is too corrupt to hold his companies to account.
The USA is highly dependent on China for animal feed supplements (all the vitamins and minerals and amino acids that they add to raw grain to make it a complete diet for factory farm raised animals).
About 50% of all the staple crops are exported, and that market will collapse. Farmers may choose not to plant anything if the market prices are too low to cover their operations.
Normally all the trucks and train cars get filled up and take our food products to the ports , empty, then fill up with imports. Since we will not be exporting, the costs of running empty trucks and trains all over will double the transport cost components. Even for distribution of domestic food items the transport system will not be efficient any more.
It’s a complex system of interdependencies that will unravel in unexpected ways.
We are definitely not covered for what will happen.
We could tolerate everything except intolerance itself.
You and I completely agree, it seems.
So how come you think it wouldn’t be a very good piece of public policy to be crystal clear and honest about that?
Like why can’t the state say: “we are not subsidizing this business with taxpayer money any more, because of their ethics”?
You can make a legal case against Tesla for accounting or SEC violations or tax fraud…but that’s not taking a moral stand.
But why do you want to attack Musk though?
Are you mad because he cheats on his taxes or his wives? We should probably broadcast that our only problem is with his taxes. That would be a better way, right? Like, dont call him out morally, tolerate that and just look for a legal case?
Do you see the problem?
That is to say I’m no stranger to “voting with my wallet”.
“A little fascism is okay when it’s my side doing it” and I say that is not okay.
You are DEEPLY confused.
Fascism is literally the system of government where businesses and the state merge. So Tesla has received over $20B in direct government subsidies and the CEO is part of the federal government.
There is no “free marketplace”, not any more.
Voting with your wallet, like fascism is literally that. Literally. This is the mechanism.
This is all going to have to change to get out of this deal. People seem to actually not even know what fascism even looks like.
Just wow. You are parroting the exact ideology. This is the actual mechanism they use.
Right now the state of NY is trying to revoke the special deal they gave Tesla’s dealers to extricate themselves (the governnent) from propping up his scam business. The state subsidizes his operation and they are merely trying to end that. That’s how it looks when you stop fascists – you cut ties between the businesses and the government.
As OC stated, “The shops haven’t done anything to warrant revoking their licenses and rat’s [Musk’s] activities are totally unrelated.”
Yes, but see, I disagree. Musk’s activities are related. Sorry, but that’s a dumb opinion, I just can’t even see how anyone can believe that.
But trying to slide that in as an assumed proposition is very important to your argument, because otherwise you are allowing an open Nazi to run a large business unchecked.
I defend Musk’s God given right to be a Nazi, but I don’t think there shouldn’t be a consequence for it. A civilization is allowed to respond to this information.
No, these two things are not morally equivalent. This is well studied, start here:
If Shitler isn’t angry and thinking of suing you for what you did to him, you’re openly doing things wrong. They precisely should state that it’s revenge so that he knows he can never prevail no matter if he wins in court. Like, the door must be closed for all time. It must be a clearly sent message that it is a personal sanction.
Reverse cause and effect. Wake up. They are already dismantling DEI and citizenship and due process and the courts and on and on. Now it’s your move in response.
They have gotten this far precisely because of the lack of spine in their opponents. They are absolutely leveraging tolerance and a rules based ordered retreat from people who don’t believe what they believe.
If you aren’t a bigot, racist or Nazi, they expect passivism, banging on powerless law books and some nasty bumper stickers as a response.
But to just revoke them as retaliation for musk’s unrelated bullshit doesn’t sit right with me.
It should.
Rules and laws come from our values. If a company isn’t moral or ethical, retaliation and consequences are exactly what needs to happen. And we should create new rules and laws to make sure they are forced out.
You do not normalize Nazis.
The tan suit had mustard stains on it, otherwise…
I can also save by geting rid of my home, car, job, investments, spouse and start eating dirt instead of food. I’d be homeless and misserable. But I’d have no expenses right now.
Turns out that the typical life people enjoy in Haiti is the ideal they are going for. Stupid libraries.
No, thats Betta.
Better is a taste similar to sour.
So it’s like you’re saying that the gold rush AI craze, crypto, meme stocks, property bubble inflation, money printing, uber and airbnb, side hustles and crowd funded health care aren’t as good as a real growing economy?
Like and subscribe.
Yes, I agree. Just as with the production/consumption disruption, the current US administration seems to be abandoning the Pax Americana commitments that led to a world of interrelations and dependencies that went beyond trade and economics. This has huge implications. The usa still has a very large military capacity, but the balance of power and what it is going to be used for…these are now in flux in a way we have not seen in living memory.
In a way, its the same logic being applied: that Europe or south America or whatever places are not capable of becoming a rival global power.
This is exactly what they think.
For example, american car factories only make 70% of their capacity. European car factories currently export 50-60% of their product to the USA.
So if there is any idea with the tarriffs (debatable), it’s that the USA will have to grow domestic production (easy) while the rest of the world needs to shrink production (hard).
In other words, there are no other consumers rich enough to buy all this stuff.
How about you do all that and then sell me your product, and then I turn around and sell it to the customer and make 5X the money you make?
<Dr. Evil $1 million dollars meme .gif >
But what if you make a department of Honey Bun Efficiency? There is surely a simple solution for your fiscal crisis.