A modern UI for ClamAV or a Subsonic Music Streaming client (In gtk4)

Des milkshake. C’est qu’on a fait au Royaume-Uni. Ca marche plutôt bien

My recommendation would be Fedora or CentOS if you want a stable workstation you won’t have to reinstall. Debian is also a great choice. OpenSUSE Tumbleweed is okay but I found it a little clunky compared to the others. Avoid EndevourOS and Manjaro like the plague.

Vinegar, Lemon juice and warm water.

Using it as an adjective in some cases is fine, never use it as a noun, unfortunately due to assholes using it that way it now has a negative conotation.

No, you can’t : in an immutable distro I can reasonably trace almost any file in the filesystem back to the package that created it, and know with a reasonable degree of certainty that the installed version of said file has not been tampered with. That isn’t possible an a normal distro.

Please do share with me what I do not understand.

A mostly read only filesystem built from a limited number of packages, with other files being in a fixed number of locations mean it is harder for malware to hide.

Very good choice :D

I used to daily drive arch, until university, when I got frustrated at the issues it caused me and the time I needed to solve them.

I’d recommend fedora if you want real solid stability.

I don’t think the DE itself matters, but I can recommend using an immutable OS (makes it harder to install malware) and installing flatpak apps only. You can also use software like flatseal to further lock down permissions

Perhaps basil with the tomatoes?

There is so much wrong with this post. Half of the points raised are utter bullshit

Dell’s current lineup is not to expensive (≈400) and runs Linux well

We have to wait and see for eIDAS, let’s hope with the changes to eIDAS dead, we’ll have at least a few years of the Commission not proposing some dumb surveillance shit

The latest text has not yet been released, but when it is you will see a separation between Identification and Encryption. It is also clearly stated that browsers are allowed to do whatever they want regarding recognition of CAs for encryption. tl;dr the status quo for encryption (linking a domain to a server) does not change, browsers will only be forced to recognise identity (linking a organisation to a server). This will force a re-engineering of QWACs/EV certs in general in favour of something like ntqwacs.

So jarring that you couldn’t just… Press no?

Just a heads up: new wording has killed this.

Parliament’s position on the proposed law will now be against chat control, but the fight is not over: next we have to negotiate with member states. It’s vital we keep the pressure on governments to end this madness.

It did, but we are also fighting against eIDAS. I’m told last night’s deal supposedly solves the problem, but I’m waiting for the text myself. (I worked on eIDAS in Parliament, my committee (Legal Affairs) recommended the complete deletion of Art45.

If it is any reassurance, not even the EU trusts the EU to control internet security: Parliament voted this down in its position, but member states are trying to bring it back. MEPs are fighting to ensure control remains with browsers.