Your things didn’t increase in perceived value as much as Amazon then
Your things didn’t increase in perceived value as much as Amazon then
amazon grows its revenue → amazon stock value increases → amazon share holder richer
Many companies also pay dividends directly to the share holder but iirc Amazon has preferred to reinvest in growth
Amazon has been really successful in several domains and he’s owned a lot of it from the start
Although if you did earn $5k per day and managed to invest at a yearly return of 3% above inflation, you’d have about $41 trillion
At 1% above interest you’d just have $3.6 billion so invest wisely
(edit, corrected the numbers)
So if we make refusal to vacate a uterus a capital offense, we have a path to compromise
Well, one is a poll, one is a meme with no data source or explanation of what’s been done to get to the possibly not very correct number
Here’s a pew research thing finding about 61% of men supporting abortion in the US in 2024; lagging behind women at 64% but not by much
the in depth technical details
TL;DR; sigalarm handler calls syslog which isn’t safe to call from a signal handler context.
Their example exploit needed about 10k attempts to get a remote shell so it’s not fast or quiet, but a neat find regardless
It uses system 2 thinking to make alterations to the plan (or idea). Rinse and repeat.
They probably meant to write system 1 thinking here.
Yeah, the 20th least polluting country is near 1000x worse than the estimated CO2 footprint in the article
You’re right… The “more than 20 countries” thing, is about 1000x away from the real number too, so I guess they dropped a “kilo” somewhere and somehow didn’t react to getting an obviously absurd result
This is hugely incorrect
… equivalent to 281,315 metric tons of CO2. This is roughly the same quantity of emissions that 75 coal-fired power plants produce in a year, and it exceeds the annual emissions of 20 individual countries and territories.
A single medium sized (1MW) coal power plant outputs about 6.3 million metric tons CO2 per year, so the comparison is three magnitudes off
I wouldn’t trust any other numbers from that site without verification
The value is tecknically the effect of what is called a stock market, and it does vary quite a bit over time as perceptions and economic factors change