Why apologize?
I also look incredibly attractive.
Turns out we all do, so it’s fine. (🍨🍨🍨 😭 )
Why apologize?
I also look incredibly attractive.
Turns out we all do, so it’s fine. (🍨🍨🍨 😭 )
oh, I toatlly typoed it
(LOL I made a perfect “What Iou See Ys What Iou Get”)
Is “pharmacists seeing more patients” really a measure of something good? I’m a non-native English speaker so cut me some slack but all I can imagine is just longer queues in the pharmacy and more tired pharmacists (and people who now need to wait in the queue now).
The pic being blurred and all, I thought it’s going to be some dad joke around “pharmacist can see more patients”
I mean, you got a point, but as citizen of Czech Republic, they don’t seem to do enough, and U.S. politics really feels like “right” and “more right”.
You guys need to fix your voting system. (I know it’s easier said than done, my country is about 5th of the age of U.S. Advantage of starting later is a real thing.)
Fun fact: With those 4 games it looks like a tie, but weighed by Steam scores, Linux wins. (Warhammer has like 3/5).
(Disclaimer: I have never played any of those 4 games and don’t plan to in a forseeable future. I also realize full well how ridiculously insignificant a sample of 4 is.)
“like this comment if you think this post is especially good”
“everything has pros and cons”
I usually give the CGP Grey’s legendary answer: “…but it’s hardly ever the case that all the pros and all the cons all PERFECTLY balance each other out, right?”
It doesn’t matter if I understand how the alien antigravity socks work -if they’re tech, they’re tech.
See? That’s what I like about the quote. It points to the fact that the difference is in the eye of the beholder.
from our perspective is implied in every sentence ever.
And no, you can’t expect phrases to “say what they mean”----that would just require them to include more phrases, etc…
deleted by creator
Stand-up meeting: “to be frank, Frank is starting his holiday in Frankfurt next week so…”
bUt WaSnT sHe iNdIAn yEsTeRdAy?!
Does it count as reliable if I only have sample size of 1?
Beyerdynamic. Had DT770 pro for 8 years before they “broke” (cable connection failed, I think it’s still fixable–making them last for many more years—by someone with skills I don’t have, and they could have lasted more if I handled them a tad better.)
Recently I replaced them with DT770 pro X and they sound perfect to me.
more like “Your couch. My choice”
I can’t verify it now or any time soon, but you might be right.
Thanks for the pointer!
perhaps there’s a alien civilization out there that’s done all this already that you can buy a colonization/uplift from. That might reasonably be a short if expensive order
This.
And if we’re speculating, why not go all the way and say we also don’t know it would be expensive. Who’s to say it would not cost, say, $15? Wouldn’t it be fun to get a Star Trek system for, like, so cheap that a kid could afford it?
(I would make sure to read the fine print, though.)
I also knew them by the name Bodies like 10 years ago. I think “Body Worlds” is a different company now.
(Not sure what happened to the old one, or if I’m even right on this. Should have done wikipedia research but don’t wanna fall into another rabbit hole :))
I mean, imagine enabling a trial and then suddenly finding yourself screaming and pooping all day, waaah, waah. 👼
That’s a noble goal but does adding more people help the (long-term only, please) effectiveness? At what point does it start hindering it?
I would assume that someone like a pharmacist has to be focused all the time, stakes is high…
Do we have precise data about how physiological state of a pharmacist is changing through the shift? Do we know whether or not the pauses between people – which we might or might not have considered a wasted time – are actually essential for their ability to stay focused and reliable? (Is the answer the same for all of them?) Or maybe they could actually still use part of that time in a productive way, right? Also, why is there lack of people in the first place?
Focusing solely on adding more people to the equation seems to neglect factors like this. This tells me that whoever this factoid is trying to impress is not someone who I would want to trust with managing a pharmacy (or anything except maybe some production line) in the first place.