Someone should realize that LLM’s aren’t always trained up to date on the latest and greatest of news. Ukraine’s conflict is two years running, and Gaza happened ~4½ months ago. It also really didn’t outright refuse, it just told the user to use search.
Was there any ketchup on those papers?
We all know that if this was a permanent part of the program, every revolving bill (mortgage, utilties, etc.) would all of a sudden rise to get a piece of that extra income. But because this was a temporary program, it probably only increased by the normal rate. So people mostly got a chance to use it without businesses getting greedier.
Dude won’t even pay his rent or severance for former employees he fired. To stay afloat he’s running the shittiest quality ads on the site. He pissed off Tesla investors by making moves about selling their stock that he promised he would never do.
Yeah, I’m not even gonna trust him with an arcade token.
And what if I don’t agree to their privacy policy? Are they really handing over that crucial part of windows to 3rd parties if we don’t want our habits tracked?
Context is key. It went from
Google Code of Conduct is one of the ways we put “Don’t be evil” into practice
to
And remember… don’t be evil, and if you see something that you think isn’t right – speak up!
So from a “we won’t be evil” to telling others to not be evil.
So yes, the context in which the statement was applied, means its very basis was removed.