Electric tank, sure. Hydrogen tank, never.

I’ll eat my socks if hydrogen powered tanks are actually purchased by any military. Hydrogen will literally never be a viable transportation fuel

Battery capacity of established chemistries*

Every guy in that drone evasion training clip would be dead, it’s like they don’t know what shrapnel is

I have a bachelors in chemical engineering, the energy balance on these devices never works out favourably. As soon as you scale up to any meaningful impact on GHGs, you get power inputs on the scale of entire countries.

If you’d like to do a proper literature review instead of daydreaming, I’d be happy to look it over

Strawmen belong in fields, not comment sections.

Also: does every ml user have an allergy to pragmatic problem solving?

High schooler post

Here’s how it works: it doesn’t

Go outside

Those nails couldn’t dig into playdough without breaking

The “Japan fires at Russian jets” is clickbait btw, they just popped flares at it.

Why would someone be holding their pager against the wall of a plane?

“if using a word improperly muddies it’s definition, so be it”

Are you anti dictionary or something?

Much more economical to store the electricity in batteries or pumped hydro than using an electrolyzer, even if you found the electrolyzer for free on the side of the road.

Using hydrogen for steel and fertilizer production are the only feasible use cases for it over the next 100 years at least, if your goal is maximum GHG reduction.

The late great Hannibal Lecter

Jagmeet is the king of champagne leftism. All talk and no action

Ass

*Tabarnack

Ltt store support is far and away the best customer support I’ve ever experienced

It was banned in public schools 30 years ago, this extends the ban to private schools