Probably because PayPal does not allow it.

There are now a lot of people who think we should be nice to billionaires because they also could become one sometime in the future

I also really like sync. I also paid for the ad free version.

But there are still some issues and the dev is, again, inactive.

We just have the ultimate license and can use all of the intellij IDEs, but you also can do everything with IDEA and some plugins. And I’m that car you still have the experience of a real IDE and not just a code editor.

Sure.

I am kind of using intellij ideas for everything. They are just so much better.

I don’t think I would want to work for an employer that is too cheap for an IDE license

They are banning emulators but are then using them themselves. They are banning roms but are then using those same roms themselves.

Sounds like hypocrisy to me

Yes, but that phrase does not tell you in which direction you have to turn to tighten it. So it doesn’t really answer the question?

But water is wet, since it is covered in water

So you want book recommendations and not where to get them? Maybe you should have mentioned that earlier

I am sure you know that, but if not:

I am using Putin as an extreme example to discuss the broader question of whether the ethics and actions of creators should influence consumer decisions, and not because Putin is directly related to the situation being discussed. Even if a notorious figure like Putin were to release a game, some people, like you in this case, might argue that the game’s quality alone should be the deciding factor in whether to support it, while others might refuse to support it based on the creator’s actions or background. I was just trying to find out if there is a line you are not going to cross or if you will play it no matter the circumstances as long as you think the game is good. And as it turns out, based on this conversation, there is a line for you and it’s literally “the game was created by Putin”

Yes, you are right. Everyone had to draw the line themselves. And if you only stop buying a game if it is from Putin, that is indeed your decision. But it obviously also means, that you do made your decision not only on the game itself. So I am not sure what your argument is here.

I think you got your answer: nobody is left enough

Yes, because it seems the studio doesn’t have any problem with misogyny

Yes, who cares if Putin releases a game as long as it’s good?

Isn’t this the game where reviewers/streamers(?) are not allowed to mention feminism?

I have asked. You only get VPN Free: https://mastodon.social/@protonprivacy/112988334950564963

I have asked. You only get VPN Free: https://mastodon.social/@protonprivacy/112988334950564963

Yes, the same contract that is criticized here also requires to mark each post as ad

In what way do you think it might violate that regulation? Ads are not forbidden as far as I know?