Yup. The feature smacks you in the face.
Yup. The feature smacks you in the face.
It’s good if you like self-hosting stuff.
However, what I tell people is this:
If you know jack about security and how to lock down a machine that is running Vaultwarden, then it’s useless. You should go with Bitwarden.
If you’re looking to install it just to play around with, I would be very cautious about what you store there, unless you can lock the system down to where it’s not accessible by the outside internet and localized only to your network.
And I have redundant backups in place in case one decides to fail, which are all encrypted with GPG and a few other measures.
If you have it installed and not accessible to anyone else but you, it’s a fun project. I like using VW and BW.
The other bonus would be no one is going to look to target you specifically unless you’re turned into a target.
Whereas if BW were to be breached, it wouldn’t have anything to do with you.
However, BW utilizes encryption, so even if they did somehow manage to get in, they can’t read your passwords.
Honestly, what I’m missing is I wish Keybase would release their server source code.
Zoom has ran that software into the ground and buried keybase in a pile of sh*t. It would be like 10 Christmases in one if someone reversed the client to create an open-source server solution or Zoom released the server code for keybase.
I love Keybase. Absolutely love that program. I HATE the company who owns it.
$5 gives you anyting you want.