<3
<3
[sarcasm]
That sounds like what a Russian propagandian would say.
If that’s not a word, it should be a word. Lets also rename the continent to Propagandia while we are at it.
I hope you keep posting! Keep up the good work.
I think likes are your best gauge for your best content. Dislikes could be easily used as an indicator to gauge audiences you dont target in the same manner. Value in all data.
No.
It is like and dislike.
Stop trying to justify it as anything else.
This is the very definition of gas lighting.
Customers: “This is not what I paid for”
Colossal Order: “You’re so toxic”
Again not new stop grandstanding it as a new effect. Media outlets have been doing this since the dawn of journalism. Scientific process created to combat it, political standards to help reduce it fand laws to make it financially unattractive act remains its not new.
The only thing that is new. The financial gain from the hype of abusing the word AI and thr media not calling it out. But hey here we are back at the start. Its not new.
Propaganda isn’t new. Sure it’s more widely available now but it’s not new
I wouldnt be too worried they’ve just made an over glorified word predictor and blender of peoples art
Well there it is, the dumbest thing I’ve read on the internet today.
Go back to basics and start with html.
So more generalisations no studies no statistics, nothing of value to the conversation. More baseless claims and empty straw manning. Keep up the good work big oil.
So you have no evidence no study and no statistics to support your baseless claims and generalisations. I thought so.
A pathetic political wedge attempt.
Still waiting for that magical evidence on gun control results in suicide reduction.
Up next generalisations the new scientific method.
How very compassionate of you.
So that’s your compassion? Ignore others around you hey. Makes sense.
because it makes it far easier to manipulate them
Oh this is hilarious, do tell, how I manipulate an entire countries statistics on suicide over time!
and get the opinions of an institute dedicated to suicide prevention
They’re absolutely right, as a generalization. Does it stop the result when access was taken away specifically for Guns. The statistics clearly show means changed over time and did the rate reduce? No. That rope lobby is looking mighty dangerous now. You better get on the case.
women are just doing it for attention
Is that what I said? Don’t worry, I don’t just make baseless claims or tell you to just google something that doesn’t exist. Suicide rate is 3 times higher for males, after all this is the topic with Guns.
higher rate of suicide among Australian males are that males tend to choose more lethal methods of suicide such as hanging (60% of male suicides), poisoning, including by car exhaust (11%), and firearms (8%). (Australian Psychological Society)
men have a greater tendency to not recognize or respond to their own negative emotions or distress, which may result in more chronic and severe emotional responses to adverse life events (Goldney et al., 2002)
Men are less inclined to communicate feelings of despair or hopelessness, and are more likely to present a stoic attitude towards misfortune (Howerton et al., 2007; Witte et al., 2012)
have fewer social connections (Denney et al 2009)
Differences in help seeking between men and women are additional contributing factors. Men tend not to seek help for emotional difficulties, often feeling that help-seeking is a weakness or failure and preferring to solve problems on their own, without being a burden on others (Emslie et al 2006)
That’s the opinion of a complete cunt,
Don’t worry you do enough gas lighting and straw-manning for everyone. At this point its assured you’re lobbying for big oil.
The gendering in the title has nothing to do with anything
Ill give you a hint, its in the title of OP’s post.
you havent been nearly upset by people failing to laser focus on that adjective
no denying, suicide rate in the elderly is highest.
find a mountain of evidence without me spoonfeeding each result to you.
just google it
The fact that you’re insisting that means reduction doesn’t work
Taking away access to guns doesn’t no. My point is supported by the fact that taking away guns from the population of Australia resulted in NO reduction in suicide. None comparing the 20 years before to the 20 years after. You can’t twist that. Its a matter of fact it increased overall and dominant means changed.
What happened when means reduction wed implemented for more common methods like jumping?
Nice straw-man.
factually inaccurate as everything else you’ve argued.
Yet I am the only one who has shown clear evidence to support it while your baseless opinion and generations continues to entertain.
They actually have not thought of that no. In fact there is a cult like level of ignorance that has already just caused a serious fire & toxic release with this exact same hair brain layout and design. That said the method of fire containment is very new out of the Netherlands I believe.
Bring on electric grid storage but don’t delude yourself it’s all sunshine and rainbows. The dangers of lithium nickel cobalt fires and toxic chemical release is very serious with a weird cult like level of ignorance. The actual grid battery fires and subsequent poisioning that’s occurred recently without consideration for the downwind population and groundwater are raising some big red flags.
Current state procedure for putting out lithium nickel cobalt fires. Hazmat gear and let it burn out.
What an atrociously dangerous planned design.
Net result. It will create another unstoppable fire that will dump poisons into ground water and the air recklessly endangering anyone down wind.
Solutions not problems:
A wild Solarwind appears
Microsoft casts sunburst, it was unsuccessful
Disney has a garbage production problem