When you compare Biden to Trump vs. the effects on the Palestinians, were Trump president again, he would not just help the Israelis exterminate the Palestinians, but encourage them to do so quickly- as he’s already told Bibi to “finish it”. So your dichotomy is more than a bit disingenuous .

  • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    82
    arrow-down
    21
    ·
    4 months ago

    If our only standard is not a Republican, then everytime Republicans lower their standards, they lower the only other option’s standards too.

    It’s not fucking sustainable.

    • njm1314@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      29
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      4 months ago

      You know I hear people say this and and yet the Democratic Party is further to the left than it was under Bill Clinton. So how does it follow? I mean I hear people say stuff like we keep moving further to the right and the Republicans certainly are, but I see a Democratic party that’s for gay rights and that didn’t use to exist. I see a Democratic Party that’s that’s talking about higher taxes on the wealthy and trade regulations and consumer protection Acts. None of that was true in the '90s. In the 90s the Democrats said the era of big government is over. Now Democrats are supporting good government policies. We can certainly support better government policies, and I personally would like to see them go much further , but I can’t see a scenario in which the Democratic party isn’t further left than they were.

        • Clent@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          4 months ago

          This is a proposed political idea. It doesn’t make it true and doesn’t make the statement that are options are reduced unless we all allow it to be true.

          If the Republican decide to burn all gay people, one cannot claim to be a democrat because they simply want to gas them all.

          We decide where the line is drawn. Ignore the propaganda that tells us we have no control over the process. That apathy is how the window shifts, not because the republicans shift.

        • bolexforsoup@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          4 months ago

          The Overton window is a way of framing change in the baseline ideology of a population. It is hardly a “law” or dogma of any kind. On its own it’s meaningless, you can’t just couch an argument in “…because of the Overton window.” It’s also got its valid detractors like broken window theory and such.

          • DessertStorms@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            4 months ago

            Lol, I wasn’t making an argument that anything is “because of the Overton window”, the OP of this thread is literally describing how the Overton window works. You, and that other person not liking or understanding it, doesn’t change that, nor the fact that what op described is demonstrably happening in politics right in front of your fucking eyes, and only “doesn’t follow logic” if you’re aggressively wilfully ignorant.

      • ChaoticNeutralCzech@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        Not in terms of pure logic but definitely in practical terms. You don’t get far in humanities if you only follow pure logic.

        • Clent@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          4 months ago

          So is societal which means it’s not a person or group but all of us. It isn’t just this one thing everyone on the left likes to point out as if that absolves them from having any personal responsibility in the matter.

          The concept causes itself to exist by acceptance that it is inevitable.

  • ceenote@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    It didn’t all happen in 2016. Fascists have been quietly diminishing the power of the electorate for decades now. We’ll keep on having “the most important election of our lifetimes” until we manage to undo the damage. IF we manage to undo the damage.

    • doingthestuff@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      The problem is fascists, but it is also compounded by neolib Democrats never reducing government authority either, but often even strengthening it, knowing full well that power can easily be seized by the extreme right at any time.

  • The Assman@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    33
    arrow-down
    12
    ·
    4 months ago

    Too young to remember how bloodthirsty Hilary was as secretary of state. Member when “we came, we saw, he died tehe”?

    • Milk_Sheikh@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      40
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      A lot of retrospective handwringing forgets this, or the vile comments that came out during Bill’s multiple sexual assault allegations.

      Hillary was not the right candidate to fight Trump, Jeb Bush more likely. After Obama, returning to an establishment candidate was a mistake, and I don’t care if “it’s her turn” after stepping aside in 2008. Politics has real consequences for people who don’t vacation in the Hamptons.

    • Narauko@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 months ago

      If the choice is between genocide and genocide + fascism, and there is no viable option 3 without genocide, then the argument is still embrace the genocide or democracy ends. The alternative is embrace genocide and who really needs all this democracy anyway?

    • vonbaronhans@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      Yeah I’m not sure how to take this post. The image is clearly both-sides-ism but the text of OPs post on it appears to be calling that bad.

      This posting format makes sense in specific subreddit/communities like /leopardsatemyface or /whitepeopletwitter. But here it just makes it unclear what the intended message is.

    • MrMcGasion@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      4 months ago

      As someone who voted 3rd party in 2016 and regrets it. While you are technically correct, the last 8 years have shown that there is so much more on the line than what I was protesting against with my 3rd party vote. I didn’t like Hillary Clinton’s positions on war. And sure, my vote probably wouldn’t have mattered all that much as I live in a very red state, but every time the Supreme Court does some bullshit, I feel a bit of regret that I didn’t use my vote to support the best candidate who actually had a chance.

  • whygohomie@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    If he had more votes in the primary, then that could have been true despite the superdelegates. As it would be true for any other candidate.

    But he/they didn’t, and here we are moping over something that didn’t happen years ago while the USSC lays the final stones in the foundation for an actual dictatorship.

    Bold strategy. Let’s see how that works out.

  • wieson@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    4 months ago

    There are some elections between 1929 and 1939 that would be more consequential.

  • multifariace@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    4 months ago

    The DNC failed to put in a non-establishment candidate, so the Republican voters made it happen.

    That huge failure continues to haunt this country while the DNC and the Republican voters double down on their mistakes.

  • S491@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    4 months ago

    I love that I get to choose whether Palestinians get the slow death of starvation and disease or the fast death of bombs and bullets

  • rsuri@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    Given enough time, shitty Twitter hot takes pollute everything. Interesting implication that somehow Hillary might have a less pro-Israel policy than Biden.

    Also: She’s cray

    • Catoblepas@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      Just straight up memory-holed the summer of 2020? And the election I guess, since people did turn out and Clinton got more votes than Trump? Let me know how blaming people for living in an undemocratic system works for hyping up voters.

        • StinkySocialist@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          4 months ago

          Bernie would definitely outperform Biden. This is just a fact. Left-Wing candidates do better with higher voter turnout. They get higher voter turnout when people are actually excited about the person they’re voting for, especially young people. Young people hate Biden. You can see this from all the protests about the genocide and Palestine he’s enabling. Will have low voter turnout compared to Bernie. Biden might lose the election giving us Trump again.

          Don’t mean to tell you what you already know a stranger. Just saw you being gaslit and wanted you to know that you’re not crazy 👈😎

          • Adub@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            4 months ago

            Yeah, how did the Bernie magic work out for Jamaal Bowman? Somehow he is the best candidate but can’t get people to attend a rally for an incumbent Democrat let alone vote for him.

            • StinkySocialist@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              4 months ago

              Have you considered that? Maybe the amount of attention Americans give the presidential election is many times more than any other election? Do you think Americans are more likely to know the current president and who they ran against In the last election than their own senator? Or their own member of the House of reps?

              Do you think that might affect things?

              Be serious my dude