Why do people assume Signal messenger isn’t spying on you? Yes, it has open source code, yes it uses end-to-end encryption. But we can’t check which code runs in the version from Google Play or the App Store. And also their APK (IPA) build process is essentially a black box, it doesn’t use GitHub Actions or some other transparent build system. I also heard from Techlore that they add a proprietary part to the apk to filter bots. The only thing I can assume is that people scanned the traffic coming from the app (Android), phone (iOS) and checked whether encryption keys were being sent to Signal or not. But it seems to me that this can be also circumvented. What do you think?

P.S. I myself use Signal to communicate with relatives and friends. Definetly not a hater.

    • 133arc585@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Says the person with a 4 day old account who’s bio is literally marketing-speak for a rival app:

      The #messaging application with #anonymous identity, #untraceable content and military-grade #security. AKA the Dark Messenger.

      Also, what is this infuriating nonsense where #every #word #is #tagged? #Can #you #not #type #normally? #Or #is #it #automated? #It’s #inane. And it hurts readability, which is really the bigger problem.

      • TopSecret Chat@mastodon.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        @133arc585
        Yes, walking the first steps here in Mastodon :-)

        We are volunteers operating under an NGO based in Ireland… not rival of Signal, WhatsApp (or similar), but instead a complement for higher privacy

        Sorry for the several hashtags, it’s just the habit when posting

        • 133arc585@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          not rival of Signal, WhatsApp (or similar), but instead a complement for higher privacy

          Sure sounds like you’re a rival if your bio is accurate. What do you gain from positioning yourself as not-a-rival? Wouldn’t it be more honest and benificial to position yourself as a rival, and be very explicit in how and why you are better than alternatives?

          Sorry for the several hashtags, it’s just the habit when posting

          Why is this a habit though? It doesn’t help discoverability, at least not for random shit like #people and #policy and #terms. What is the point of that? Don’t all these services have full-text search, where searching for #Signal and Signal are equally effective at finding comments mentioning Signal? And, even if it was exceptionally useful at helping discoverability, it really hurts readability: it becomes harder to scan and is visually cluttered. It takes me significantly longer to read somethign full of #tags than without, and I’m lately likely to forgo reading such a comment entirely rather than put up with line noise.

          • TopSecret Chat@mastodon.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            @133arc585

            A rival sounds more like fighting against, but we rather designed a complementary solution that secure your data and metadata also while is use.
            With Confidential Computing the messages are not traditionally stored/deleted, but they operate in a memory enclave so they cannot be retrieved with forensic technology… of course this comes with a capacity limit, focusing on (few) highly confidential comms.

            We’ll take the feedback about the hashtags in consideration. Thanks

            • 133arc585@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 year ago

              That’s fair, rival does have a different connotation than “competitor”, which is a more accurate term here I think.

              Is the source code fully available for your product?

              • TopSecret Chat@mastodon.social
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                @133arc585

                The client-code is naturally open, while currently the core-engine is kept highly encrypted and we do not publish it (yet) as open-source.
                There’s a bit of a debate about pros & cons of opening it, regarding confidential comms.
                Anyway we are independently pen-tested by volunteers.
                Thanks for asking 👍