"In November, when voters elect three City Council members from each of four large districts, they will do so with a version of ranked-choice voting not used in any other U.S. city.

Voters will be allowed to choose up to six council candidates in order of preference, and candidates will only need 25% of first-, second- and potentially even third- and fourth-choice votes to win."

  • 𝕽𝖚𝖆𝖎𝖉𝖍𝖗𝖎𝖌𝖍@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    35
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    This title is click bait, and wrong. Ranked Choice Voting is used, and has been in use, across the country for years - including in city councils.

    In particular, city councils in St Paul and Minneapolis used Ranked Choice for elections in 2023.

    Are the reporters just bad at their jobs, or is it just click bait hinging on the specifics of the “version” of Ranked Choice Voting? What’s so different about their “version” of RCV that makes it so deserving of the alarmist title?

    The article is paywalled.

    • MyTurtleSwimsUpsideDown@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      It looks like the difference between the RCV elections you linked and the Portland one is that the Portland election has 3 seats available per district race instead of 1. There are at least 3 ways that could be managed:

      1. Do a standard RCV elimination, but stop once you have 3 candidates left.

      2. Do a standard RCV elimination until you have a majority candidate. That candidate gets one of the seats. Then remove that candidate, reassign their votes, and continue elimination until you have a new majority candidate. Repeat.

      3. Do a standard RCV elimination until you have a majority candidate. That candidate gets one of the seats. Then restart the RCV count for the second seat with voters’ 1st choices, but the first seat winner removed from the running. Repeat for the third seat.

      Edit: It’s none of the above! 😂 It’s a combination of 2 & 3 known as Single Transferrable Vote. The article (archived) doesn’t at all explain how counting works, but this video does.

    • jordanlund@lemmy.worldOPM
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      4 months ago

      Sorry about that, I promise it wasn’t paywalled when I linked it. :( Looks like archive.org got 2 copies of it and both of them are the paywall version.

      Here’s what separates out what Portland is doing:

      Previously you had 5 city council people and each one had certain city bureaus they were in charge of, with the Mayor having the police department.

      They were each elected “at large”, so while they had bureau responsibilities, nobody was accountable for any one particular district of the city.

      Now what’s going to happen is the city is split into 4 districts, each district gets 3 city council members. All the city bureaus are being moved to a new City Manager position.

      The 12 council members will vote on city policy in a style similar to the Senate, with the Mayor holding the tie breaking vote.

      The election itself, seems like it could be pretty chaotic. Each district will have an entire slate of candidates to fill the three positions, and it’s “vote for three” with ranked choice balloting.

      So, in my district, district 1, there are 17 candidates:

      https://www.portlandmercury.com/city-council-race-2024/2023/11/21/46766358/meet-the-portland-city-council-candidates-district-1

      That, alone, would be a hell of a choice in any election, but there are THREE OTHER DISTRICTS.

    • thisbenzingring@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      Because the reactionaries are nuts about Portland politics and the puppet masters gotta whip them into an angry mob.