• Telorand@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    150
    ·
    2 months ago

    I have some personal qualms about supporting “the biggest fish” in the pond, since that tends to lead to the Apples, the Googles, and the Microsofts.

    However, Steam hasn’t particularly abused its market power, and has even used it to create a very successful Linux handheld that has both helped propel Linux desktop adoption and added upstream improvements to Linux in general.

    I’ll revise my opinion when Valve changes to a more overtly predatory model of capitalism, but for now, I’ll enjoy only needing to keep a partial eye open.

    • magic_lobster_party@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      102
      ·
      2 months ago

      I’ll revise my opinion when Valve changes to a more overtly predatory model of capitalism

      I believe as long they’re not publicly traded )and Gabe is in charge), that’s not a concern.

      Being public (or owned by a publicly traded company) tend to bring out these nasty traits. It’s more about finding ways to bring value to shareholders than the customers.

      • Shiggles@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        66
        ·
        2 months ago

        Private companies can be dicks. Public companies can and will be sued by their shareholders if they aren’t big enough dicks.

      • cobysev@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        34
        ·
        2 months ago

        I’m terrified of Gabe retiring or passing away. He’s been amazing for the company and I don’t trust anyone else to not want to use Valve for their own greedy purposes. The next president of Valve will likely ruin all the good things about it, thanks to late-stage capitalism.

        I firmly believe in voting with your wallet; I normally don’t invest much long-term interest into businesses because you never know how they’ll change over time, but I’ve been so happy with Valve that I’ve gladly given them thousands of dollars over the decades for Steam games. My library is sitting at just over 3,500 games right now. I don’t know what I’m gonna do when Valve crumbles one day. I really hope they give me an option to download and play offline all the games I’ve bought, because that’s a massive library to lose.

        I’ve never given a penny to Epic Games, and unless they get on-par with Steam’s functionality, I won’t ever buy or play any of their games. The one thing that might make Epic Games competitive (and could convince me to use their platform) is letting Steam users copy their libraries over, so we’re not just starting over from scratch with a new service.

        That’s what got me on Steam in the first place. Back around 2010 or so, I discovered that if you had a physical PC game that was also in Steam’s store, you could type in the serial number on the game box and it would register and add it to your Steam library. That’s how I got my collection of early Call of Duty titles on Steam, as well as Half-Life and some others. I moved my physical game library over to Steam and I’ve been a Steam loyalist ever since.

        • snooggums@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          2 months ago

          Back around 2010 or so, I discovered that if you had a physical PC game that was also in Steam’s store, you could type in the serial number on the game box and it would register and add it to your Steam library.

          There were a few older games I owned that had trouble with running well on newer hardware because of the messy manual updates. Did the seriel bumber i to steam and it installed and updated to a smooth running version on steam at no cost.

          Yes, this tied the hard copy to the steam account so there was a loss of reselling unless they changed that at some point. But I never bothered with selling used games and these were old enough that nobody wanted them anyway so I got some free use out of something I was almost ready to throw out.

        • Zonetrooper@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          2 months ago

          Back around 2010 or so, I discovered that if you had a physical PC game that was also in Steam’s store, you could type in the serial number on the game box and it would register and add it to your Steam library.

          WAIT WHAT.

          Does this happen even if the game wasn’t on Steam at time of purchase so long as it has a Steam version now? Because that would be amazing.

      • seaQueue@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        2 months ago

        I really hope GabeN has a continuity plan that involves a nonprofit governance board when he’s no longer in the picture. I don’t even want to imagine valve as a publicly traded company (or owned by a private equity company for that matter.)

      • Phen@lemmy.eco.br
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 months ago

        Anyone in charge of a non-publicly traded company will want to do what’s best for the company in the long term instead of milking as much from it as fast as they can, so I don’t think that replacing Gabe by someone else will be the end of Valve like so many people claim.

        • Damage@feddit.it
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          2 months ago

          Not necessarily. Sometimes even owners just want to milk as much as possible as fast as they’re able.

          Source: life.

        • phdepressed@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          2 months ago

          The problem is that you can never be certain about someone’s ability to stand their morals atop money until it is truly offered to them. Supposedly Gaben has turned down Billion dollar offers for steam. It is certainly not every person who will do so and it is hard to know how a person will react until that is truly offered to them. I don’t know that I’d turn it down (though I also don’t know how much Gaben makes).

    • fluxion@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      2 months ago

      They’re also directly funding linux devs to work on related projects, which the most mutually-beneficial way to build products around linux

      • Telorand@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        GOG is great, but they need to make a Linux launcher, already. Or if they can’t, they should make it so the community can.

        • Duamerthrax@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          2 months ago

          Yes. It’s not like you can’t even buy linux games on it. It was some jumping through hoops, but if you buy Factorio on GoG, you can get the linux version.

          • Val@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            Wube (creators of Factorio) have the best customer policy in game development.

            • Don’t go on sale so you will always pay the cheapest price.
            • if you have the game on steam you can download a DRM-free version directly from their website. (alongside all old versions)
            • Encourage the community to create mods, host your own mod portal accessible inside the game.
            • Make a good game.
            • Be open about game development through monthly blog posts.

            The only way I would like it more is if the game was open source but since that’s impossible to sell I will take this.

          • Telorand@reddthat.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            For sure, but it’s not really the same functionality. You can play your games, but you can’t buy or redeem any others from Heroic or Lutris.

            • qwerty@discuss.tchncs.de
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              2 months ago

              It has a store page, basically an embedded web browser, I redeem free epic games through it, don’t know about GOG but I’d imagine it works the same.

              • Telorand@reddthat.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                2 months ago

                It’s still a third party solution. There’s no reason they couldn’t make a Linux client for Galaxy, and some people want to use the official launchers.

    • big_slap@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      2 months ago

      I’ll revise my opinion when Valve changes to a more overtly predatory model of capitalism, but for now, I’ll enjoy only needing to keep a partial eye open.

      this is the correct approach towards how a society should support big buisnesses. the companies that don’t fuck us over will continue to get my public support and money

  • Asafum@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    66
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 months ago

    The one thing I like about them is they recognized why people really wanted to stick with steam: they have a large established library and don’t want to bounce back and forth.

    They took that and said “ok we’ll give you free games every week until you have a large library here and won’t want to leave!”

    Jokes on them, I now have a large library of completely free games on epic and still use steam for the games I want to buy because I refuse to support their exclusivity bullshit.

    • Zorque@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      2 months ago

      I mean, Steam is also very functional and has a ton of support features. Especially for modding. It’s not just stockholm syndrome.

    • JoeKrogan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      I get the games on epic but I haven’t even bothered playing them because I game exclusively on linux and just have not bothered with lutris / heroic etc. Proton with steam is just effortless and after years of tinkering with wine back in the day I want the simplicity

    • Crikeste@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      You don’t need a subscription like Prime to get the free games? I was under the impression you do.

    • FlihpFlorp@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 months ago

      Can you also launch the games through steam to get features like the overlay and stuff

      • Asafum@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        I believe you can, I haven’t tried though. The games install like any other and have an .exe you can point to through steam so it would probably just be a matter of having the epic launcher open as well when you go to play.

        • FlihpFlorp@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          Ah cus I have a faint memory of getting games thru Amazon and launching thru steam but idr if I had the overlay

    • spread@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      Epic feels like a kid’s toy compared to steam imo. Just overall less usable and dumbed down.

    • AeroLemming@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      I resolved to never give Epic a dime when I got a popup forcing me to agree to a binding arbitration agreement in order to launch games I already have installed and in my library. It tells me that they think people will have good reasons to sue them in the future.

      • InFerNo@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        You can send a snail mail to opt out, which is scummy at best, but technically you can opt out.

  • Frozyre@kbin.melroy.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    49
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 months ago

    Let’s see…

    The launcher itself ran poorly compared to Steam’s. I’ve had instances of it freezing performance down just downloading 1 game through Epic’s launcher.

    You’ve locked down games behind multi-year exclusives, pissing off many people along the way that we’re now just seeing their Steam releases.

    You’ve spent years giving free games away, promising not to do anymore, going back to doing it again.

    The launcher and storefront are incredibly barebones compared to Steam’s. In fact, any launcher not Steam, has incredibly minimal to go with other than just running games through them.

    • tiredofsametab@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      And, around launch, didn’t have payment processors in multiple countries meaning people were just fucked by exclusives

    • pop@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      2 months ago

      WTF. I would fucking love barebones launcher. I was holding off using epic launcher because it was so laggy and slow when it first came out. I was using legendary before, but stopped using Epic altogether. Might just give it a try again.

      I’m starting to feel steam is getting bloated and plain annoying. I just want a launcher to launch a game and pair with my friends after a long day at work. I don’t want a crappy browser following me around in the background. I already have a browser if I need it. We use a different app for voice so could do away with all the other bs as well.

      • greenskye@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        2 months ago

        If all you want is to launch a game, why keep the ‘launcher’ at all? Games used to just… start. No separate program needed.

  • NeryK@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    41
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 months ago

    The Epic Games Launcher is so far behind on features compared to Steam it’s not even funny. Epic chose not to try and compete with Steam on that front and to try and force users onto the platform with exclusivity deals and sweeten the deal with free games.

    The one user-centric killer feature Epic has in their stack IMHO is the built-in multiplayer crossplay. Except it’s not even exclusive to their store ironically (you do need an Epic account for it though).

    • Giooschi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      Epic chose not to try and compete with Steam on that front

      Forget competing, they lack even the basics.

      • MHLoppy@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        What do you consider basic that it’s still missing? To be honest I’ve felt content with it as a game launcher for a while now, but I admittedly don’t use it that often either.

          • MHLoppy@fedia.io
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            2 months ago

            I kinda understand it not being a priority; even if they dedicated the resources to both create and adequately maintain Linux support, I imagine very few of the games on the platform have native support anyway. Sure, many would work (to varying degrees) with the various bags of tricks available, but it’s still an extra step of compatibility that’s sort of beyond their immediate control.

            • frazorth@feddit.uk
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              edit-2
              2 months ago

              Fuck off. They paid to remove support for Linux from Rocket League because their launcher doesn’t support it.

              Existing games that had Linux support already.

              • MHLoppy@fedia.io
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                4
                ·
                2 months ago

                Thanks for so politely and cordially sharing that information


                edit: I would be even more appreciative if it were true: https://www.rockpapershotgun.com/rocket-league-ending-mac-and-linux-support-because-they-represent-less-than-0-3-of-active-players

                Quoting their statement:

                Regarding our decision to end support for macOS and Linux:

                Rocket League is an evolving game, and part of that evolution is keeping our game client up to date with modern features. As part of that evolution, we’ll be updating our Windows version from 32-bit to 64-bit later this year, as well as updating to DirectX 11 from DirectX 9.

                There are multiple reasons for this change, but the primary one is that there are new types of content and features we’d like to develop, but cannot support on DirectX 9. This means when we fully release DX11 on Windows, we’ll no longer support DX9 as it will be incompatible with future content.

                Unfortunately, our macOS and Linux native clients depend on our DX9 implementation for their OpenGL renderer to function. When we stop supporting DX9, those clients stop working. To keep these versions functional, we would need to invest significant additional time and resources in a replacement rendering pipeline such as Metal on macOS or Vulkan/OpenGL4 on Linux. We’d also need to invest perpetual support to ensure new content and releases work as intended on those replacement pipelines.

                The number of active players on macOS and Linux combined represents less than 0.3% of our active player base. Given that, we cannot justify the additional and ongoing investment in developing native clients for those platforms, especially when viable workarounds exist like Bootcamp or Wine to keep those users playing.

        • unconfirmedsourcesDOTgov@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          2 months ago

          For me it’s the inability to set my status to “invisible”.

          It’s not that I don’t want to game with people, but sometimes I want to practice alone without being bombarded by invites.

          • MHLoppy@fedia.io
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 months ago

            Fair enough! I barely use its social side since most of the games I’ve played on there are singleplayer titles - honestly didn’t even know that wasn’t there yet!

          • MHLoppy@fedia.io
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 months ago

            I guess our opinions differ, because I don’t consider either of those to be “basics”. They’re nice features for e.g., Steam to have, sure, but they’re not “game launcher 101” imo.

            • jack@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              2 months ago

              That’s a fair take. We all have different priorities.

              We use in home streaming nearly every day now, so it’s a must have for me. Remote play together is critical for certain games as well.

  • greenskye@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    Things I need a storefront/launcher to provide me:

    • Reviews
    • Wish list
    • Beta/Alternate build installations
    • Friend list, chat, game invite functions
    • Mod browser
    • Refund policy
    • Excellent search and discovery tools

    Nice to have:

    • Forum for guides/support
    • Game sharing
    • Ability to move game files
    • druidjaidan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      2 months ago

      As a family…I need the family sharing provided by steam. Especially the recent beta version. It’s fantastic.

    • FiniteBanjo@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Two things that would be nice to have is:

      • If Steam’s mod directory didn’t REQUIRE you to buy the game on Steam

      • Shared Games could be played simultaneously

  • Davel23@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    28
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    Didn’t take long for Randy’s tone to change after the Epic bribe money dried up.

  • sylver_dragon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 months ago

    One thing that we have learned is that piracy is not a pricing issue. It’s a service issue. The easiest way to stop piracy is not by putting antipiracy technology to work. It’s by giving those people a service that’s better than what they’re receiving from the pirates. – Gabe Newell, 2011

    Time and again, digital distribution platforms have proved this. Apple Music became a dominant music distribution platform at the height of Napster, LimeWire and other peer to peer sharing apps. They did it, because it was easier to just buy the tracks/albums you wanted than to dig through trackers and websites which may or may not actually have what you want. Netflix became the de-facto source for streaming movies at a time when BitTorrent was common and well known. Again, they made it easy and convenient, while not charging an arm and a leg. Steam also faced competition from BitTorrent piracy. But again, Steam made buying, downloading and running games easier than the pirates. And people are willing to pay for that convenience and not dealing with the crap which floats around the high seas.

    And, so long as Steam continues to treat it’s customers right, those customers will keep coming back. And that’s the problem with Pitchford’s whole premise. Developers will go where the customers are. Sure, you’ll get the odd case of a publisher/developer doing an exclusivity deal. But even then, it’s probably limited, because the customers are on Steam. If another storefront wants to draw customers, they need to start with treating customers well. They will still face headwinds, as Steam has a large “first mover” advantage. But, success is going to start with making customers want to come back.

    • pop@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      yea let’s just forget about the illegality of those things and how companies, ISPs and law enforcements fight tooth and nail to shut those services down repeatedly.

      You ever wonder why these companies don’t operate in countries that don’t have strict piracy laws and can’t shut down sites with court orders? Because it’s still easier to pirate than face criminal charges.

  • 58008@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    Lose the ‘infinite growth’ promise to shareholders (in fact, lose the whole shareholder thing entirely). That’s the root of all evil right there. It’s the cause of all woes suffered by gamers, devs and even the very sociopathic CEOs who think Epic exclusivity is a sound financial strategy. We all suffer for it, and all to benefit shareholders who, in 2024, still believe the lie that next year’s profits will exceed this year’s. It’s delusional, and even if it weren’t, it would quite literally be cancerous. Cancer is just a board of shareholders in a biological system.

  • CALIGVLA@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    No shit. Everyone was saying this from day one, but Sweeney was too stupid to realize it.

  • MentalEdge@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    There’s only one thing I want from gearbox anymore. For them to re-enable the online servers for Battleborn so I can finish the damn story mode for a game I bought.

    ReBorn doesn’t work on Linux yet, (or at least it crashes for me).

      • NeryK@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        26
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        Probably referring to the 6-month timed exclusivity on PC for EGS that Borderlands 3 went through.

        • rtxn@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          22
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          And the fact that Epic couldn’t cobble together a content delivery platform that supported preloading before BL3’s release.

          And the fact that they used Steam essentially as an advertising platform until the TOS was changed.

        • nondescripthandle@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          13
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          As someone who sunk hundreds of hours into each of 1 and 2, the staggered launch felt like it did so much damage to player base as well as player interest. Felt like when I was interested in it none of the old hardcore raiders I used to play with were and vice versa. And thats after I was the one to crawl to epic because I was afraid of missing out that sweet endgame co op high I got from 1 and 2.

          • jack@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            10
            ·
            2 months ago

            I loved BL1 and 2 so much, my pets are named after characters from the games. The staggered launch of BL3 caused me to forget about it for years after release.

            • nondescripthandle@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              2 months ago

              The DLC didn’t help either, I was thinking about getting it to hop back on right around the same time the steam players were ready for something else for a bit. I actually really liked the game. Story was whatever but had as much fun as I can have by myself in a game like that.

          • Chronographs@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            2 months ago

            I played a ton of 2 and presequel but only just bought 3 at like a 90% discount and even then I’m not exactly interested in playing it.

  • gnuplusmatt@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 months ago

    I log into EGS via heroic a few times a year to claim a free game. Yet to ever play any said free games 🤷

  • whenyellowstonehasitsday@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    2 months ago

    with the amount of money they apparently had available to spend on this little jolly, it’s absolutely incredible how much they fumbled things by trying to force their way in instead of asking nicely

    if they just hadn’t done exclusives, and had instead relied on their decreased split to offer lower prices, while chucking in the odd free game, they’d probably be a lot closer to the 50% of revenue they were hoping for when they started

    valve is actively abusing their monopoly by preventing epic from offering the same product(s) at lower prices in their storefront, and their customer base are happy about it because of thoroughly epic pissed everybody off with their opening move

    what chumps

    • Chronographs@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      2 months ago

      I was actually excited about a new storefront that, if anything, might’ve made steam improve and then there was that game awards where it felt like every single game they showed was an epic exclusive and I lost all interest.