• reksas@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Fuck hollywood.

    This would be good opportunity for people to start new film studios and such, founded on more equal profit sharing. Let greedy pieces of shit shrivel and die without labor to exploit. There is no negotiating with those kinds of people as they will just try to find ways to force and manipulate people to do what they want.

    • TrenchcoatFullOfBats@belfry.rip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s also worth noting that many of the “indie” production companies are backed by billionaire money. For example, Annapurna (movies: Her, Zero Dark Thirty, American Hustle, games: Journey, Stray, Kentucky Route Zero, Outer Wilds) was founded by Megan Ellison, the daughter of Larry Ellison of Oracle software, worth about $150 billion.

      Indian Paintbrush, the production company that has financed all of Wes Anderson’s movies since 2007, is run by Steven Rales, CEO of Danaher, worth $7.3 billion.

      It’s not just production or indie firms either - CAA (Creative Artists Agency) talent agency that represents people like Tom Hanks, Steven Spielberg, The Weeknd, Bob Dylan, Aubrey Plaza, Bradley Cooper, Cardi B, Chris (Evans, Hemsworth and Pine), Salma Hayek and thousands of writers, producers and directors, is currently in final talks to be purchased by Francois-Henri Pinaul, who owns Gucci, Balenciaga, Girard-Perregaux and Christie’s auction house, is married to Salma Hayek, and is worth about $33 billion.

    • Aux@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s ironic that Hollywood was created by filmmakers and actors who got tired of being exploited by investors and cinemas alike.

          • potoo22@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            People dislike a greedy business.
            Start a humble competing business.
            Greedy business falls in line or fails.
            Competing business now free to push profits, becoming greedy business.
            People dislike a greedy business.

            • randon31415@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              People dislike a greedy business. Start a humble competing business. Greedy business lowers prices to crush competition, or buys it outright. People continue to dislike a greedy business.

  • Tygr@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’ve been “striking” for a long time now, against junk TV in general. There’s an occasional awesome show that delivers but 95% of it is low-effort junk TV like dating, survival, cooking and other shows like it.

    I haven’t had live TV in years and it’s quite shocking to see what the average user deals with. Junk TV + ads that play 30% of the time is absolutely insane.

    • HeartyBeast@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      low-effort junk TV like dating, survival, cooking and other shows like it.

      … in other words, exactly the shows that don’t use actors or writers

    • blivet@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I haven’t had live TV in years and it’s quite shocking to see what the average user deals with. Junk TV + ads that play 30% of the time is absolutely insane.

      Yeah, I’ve had the same experience. We don’t have live TV, and when we occasionally hang out with friends or family who do I’m always flabbergasted at the frequency and length of ad breaks nowadays, and similarly amazed that despite a nearly endless list of channels there never seems to be anything I actively want to watch.

      • leapingleopard@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I can’t believe the people that allow commercials to blare in their living rooms without diving for the remote control like the house is on fire. Is it just me? and they just continue normal conversation like it’s somehow possible to hear them.

      • AbidanYre@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Bruce was talking about it 30 years ago when we had 57 channels and nothin’ on. It’s only gotten worse since then.

      • timetraveller@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        I had one of them first TiVos, then upgraded to them expanded versions modes online for 1TB of shows. The 30-second skip button pressed six(6) times would effectively (skip) the ads. Never looked back. When I see or hear a commercial at someone’s house it rocks me like I’m in a different dimension and time.

        • FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Personally I rarely watch TV in real time, so the only time of year I ever really see commercials is during the NFL season.

    • mmagod@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      lol only 30%?

      jokes but i agree… i remember going to visit some relatives and sat and watched tv with them… i too was so shocked at how they’d sit idly thru commercials jarring into their show, slapping them in the face…

      i can’t stand it. just about anything i watch, when i watch, is commercial free

      • MyNameIsIgglePiggle@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I think they get that from most half hour shows are 22 minutes and hour shows only 42 minutes.

        But if course networks have been known to cut them back even further to squeeze some more ads in

  • Clown_Tempura@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Wow it’s almost like people’s tolerance for ruthless exploitation isn’t infinite. Hollywood’s disgusting parasitic grifters can get fucked.

  • Smacks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Whole lot of the bigger establishments have been going through the ringer lately

  • Millie@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    What’s it going to take to actually do something about these ultra-rich leeches literally destroying our planet and everything good on it to inflate a number in a bank somewhere? How do we actually build up the initiative to stop it?

    All our other problems seem largely centered around our inability to appropriately respond to extreme greed. Not only in actually actively stopping it, but in even identifying it or being able to properly censure it in the first place. The moment you start talking about the rich being the cause of our problems, there’s a section of society that starts tuning you out. I definitely feel like as things get worse people are starting to catch on, but even once we’re there, where do we go?

    If we actually get to the point of agreeing that excessive wealth is inherently misanthropic and should be a crime in and of itself, how do we make it a crime while so much power sits in the hands of those who’d be on the losing end of that decision?

    I hope the WGA and SAG can spark a change in people’s consciousness around labor. I’d honestly love to see a lot more interviews and independent podcasts coming from the picket lines. If there’s anyone who can convince Americans to fight for the value of their labor, it’s the people write and play the parts in the stories they love.

    • jkure2@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      What’s it going to take to do something about these ultra rich assholes

      Let’s be honest the only answer is [redacted], they effectively own the government in the US and it’s not much better in Europe

      • TrenchcoatFullOfBats@belfry.rip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        But what are we going to DO about the 5–12 feet tall, blood-drinking, shape-shifting reptilian humanoids from the Alpha Draconis?

    • assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I want to add on some quick math. Some people will look at this and scoff, saying that actors are millionaires and are more similar to these billionaire leeches than to us. A billion isn’t a number you can easily wrap your head around – I have trouble putting it into the correct perspective and scale, and I’m an engineer. It’s really difficult. So to try and show exactly how much money we’re talking here, I’m going to use time:

      • 35k seconds, 9.7 hours
      • 70k seconds, 19.4 hours
      • 100k seconds, 1.16 days
      • 250k seconds, 2.9 days
      • 1m seconds, 11.6 days
      • 10m seconds, 115.7 days
      • 100m seconds, 3.2 years
      • 1b seconds, 31.7 years

      I haven’t even lived for 1 billion seconds yet, and I’m 28! Even an actor who’s racked up $100m over a successful career is closer to $0 than they are to $1b. Now arguably I’d say $100m is at the point where it needs to be treated similarly to $1b, but even so. The average working adult is closer to an actor in terms of wealth than these disgusting hoarders.

      In reality, every dollar isn’t equal, and what this analysis doesn’t take into account is the amount leftover after all necessities are paid for, which is the reason why someone making $35k is not living like a millionaire. The point here is, a billion is incredibly big. It’s unfathomable. Unless the person protesting is a billionaire, they’re on your side against the leeches and absurdly wealthy.

      (I suspect this is why actors tend liberal and billionaires tend conservative.)

    • knivesandchives@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      That’s a really good question. Part of the problem, of course, is that the game is rigged: consider how difficult it is to buy food that doesn’t feed the Nestle war chest.

      As a society, I think there are moves in the right direction - I just stumbled across something called Community Wealth Building, which is very cool, for example.

      But as a private individual? That’s harder. I’d love it if there were an Amazon equivalent out there that sourced exclusively from worker owned co-ops, or at least unionized businesses, but as it is, I’m coming up dry…

    • SwallowsDick@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      The fact that most people will reflexively reject and wilt at the idea of a wealth cap, or at least enforceablely taxing every dollar made above a certain amount at 99%, is a testament to the many decades of often-subtle propaganda that makes people think that modern western capitalism is the only way. As well as the continuing de-funding of public education and making colleges less accessible.

      • Buddahriffic@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        And another part of the problem (and IMO one of the biggest ones) is that the propaganda is only their first line of defense. If the rich and ultra powerful feel actually threatened, they don’t have to rely on soft power. See Epstein’s fate as well as the Panama papers reporter.

    • ConTheLibrarian@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      We need enough people to agree on both a vehicle and a direction.

      • There are a lot of people dissatisfied with the current government(s) but don’t agree how to create change; be it through the current system, major modifications to the current system, or even more severe changes.

      • There are a lot of people who don’t want wide spread poverty/suffering, but don’t agree on how that problem should be dealt with; be it through universal income, massive public projects, or wealth taxation and better competition regulations.

      IMO we need a new digital/decentralized/open-source/transparent ‘social media platform’ that can replace the current easily manipulated electoral systems.

      We need ideas & policies to be independently actionable from the partisan politics that afaic specifically exist to mitigate change and maintain the influence of money in policy.

      • Mayoman68@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Not sure if this is directly applicable but there’s the concept of dual power, where you can organize a bottom up power structure that takes some power from the regular government without needing to either submit to it or outright overthrow it. With that said it has only ever been successful in cases where the government is incredibly unstable to begin with.

      • Danterious@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I agree that that we do need something like a collective action platform so people can coordinate much better than they currently do. Also something that you didn’t directly mention but I think you imply is that there doesn’t need to be complete agreement before action is taken because there are alot of valid disagreements on how to move forward but there are also alot of agreements as well that are ignored in public conversation because we take those points as a default.

        I’ve been working on something similar to this on my own time (which you can see in my post history) but honestly we won’t move forward if we don’t actively start working together properly.

    • SCB@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      The moment you start talking about the rich being the cause of our problems, there’s a section of society that starts tuning you out.

      That’s because this is an insane claim.

      If we actually get to the point of agreeing that excessive wealth is inherently misanthropic and should be a crime in and of itself

      This is a massive “If.” I could probably never be convinced that one person’s wealth is inherently detrimental to someone else’s well-being.

      These are very extreme views. I support the Hollywood strike, my buddy is a union leader (as were both my parents), and I’m a reliably Democrat voter, and I couldn’t disagree more with what you’ve said above.

      • Rodeo@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        That’s because this is an insane claim.

        Consider that they have the power to massively improve everyone’s lives but are choosing not to.

        Perhaps they didn’t personally cause and create some of those problems, but they are still the only ones with the power to make the necessary changes, so the continuation of those problems is indeed their doing.

        • SCB@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          In what way does the logistics revolution spurred by Amazon’s growth not massively benefit every person who buys anything in the US? You’re seriously suggesting with a straight face, that Microsoft hasn’t saved literally hundreds of millions of lives just in database tech alone?

          You’re talking out of your ass here man. Hell, you’re putting billionaires on par with running a government which is simply absurd.

          It’s not on rich people to save the fucking world, though Bill Gates has personally done more for the world than most governments ever have. It’s on voters to pass policies that provide them better lives. That’s the point of democracy

          • Rodeo@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Are you serious lmao

            You think billionaires have no influence on government? Please

            • SCB@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              I think you don’t understand how government functions in any real way at all

      • 33KK@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        The thing is, you can’t get that rich by playing fair, it’s only possible at the expense of others. And I can assure you, most rich people are activelty making our lives worse.

              • 33KK@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                Anticonsumer, anticompetitive practices, corruption and lobbying in their own interest, propaganda, tax evasion…

                • SCB@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  I lobbied in my own interest not 15 minutes ago, as part of Citizens Climate Lobby. Just got off a zoom meeting with my rep. Lobbying is not inherently bad.

                  Can you prove tax evasion? That’s a serious crime.

                  Also, shameless plug - consider joining your local chapter of CCL! Took me 5 minutes to sign up and all meetings have been via zoom.

                  https://citizensclimatelobby.org/

  • vimdiesel@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    This is the best possible outcome. No one wants that AI generated shit while actors and behind the scenes people make starvation wages.

  • Margot Robbie@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    If you still have the bird app or some other method, send your support of solidarity to your favorite actors. They will definitely appreciate it.

    • dudebro@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Glad you guys are fighting so hard to make more money while children go without food and water.

      History really does repeat itself and that’s why these problems never get solved.

    • vimdiesel@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      You wanna get really mad? A new practice they were trying to pull off was bring in some young good looking actors; do 3d body scans, record a bunch of voice data, and then have them allow the studios a perpetual license to use their likeness for a few thousand bucks. How evil is that?

      • lohrun@fediverse.boo
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’s only a matter of time for desperate people to sell their likeness to a company doing that. If there was a company out there saying they’d pay you $3k to do a full body 3d scan, record 1 hour of voice lines, and own the rights to your image…do you know how many people would do that? (Probably a significant amount)

        Evil and awful yes, but people are desperate for cash in this economy and most people wouldn’t truly understand what they are giving up to the company

    • Dojan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yeah! I’m sick of it. Not only do they want infinite money but also infinite growth.

      Literally like a cancer. Feasting on society until nothing is left.

    • jimmyjoners@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      This. I want more strikes. I’m tired of everything going to shit and the masses sit back and do nothing. I’ve gone to a few protests recently, and honestly it’s cheap therapy for me. Feels nice to actually DO something.

      • kklusz@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        And what have you actually accomplished with marching and shouting? I went to quite a few BLM protests back in 2020, got tear gassed and shit along with my friends, and yet still haven’t seen anything meaningful change.

        • CeruleanRuin@lemmy.one
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Change is slowwwww, my brother. It’s rare that an actual upheaval happens and things shift noticably overnight.

          It is and always has been a long, long struggle, and there is no final victory, only temporary triumphs that must be vigorously defended, because the enemy will never stop trying to take back every inch.

          • lohrun@fediverse.boo
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Change doesn’t have to be slow and we don’t need to make more excuses for the people able to make the change. Protests outside of the US have shown how to accelerate change in the direction they want. At this point though, it appears that a lot of people have given up hope that anything will change

            • CeruleanRuin@lemmy.one
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              And can you blame them? The opposition infrastructure is so incredibly overbuilt that it’s like trying to chip away at a wall when they keep taking away your tools.

  • EmperorHenry@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’m glad more and more workers are realizing the power they have over the industries they’re working in.

    Without the workers, the businesses have nothing. We really need to have a serious revolution before they replace all jobs with AI robots.

  • zombuey@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Fake news, these are all crisis actors. They didn’t even try I’ve seen many of these people in movies!

  • recursivesive@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    While I agree that the compensation has been way too low for the working class, I fucking hate how this is used as an excuse when it hits certain group. “what are we waiting for?” as if the real working class (employees of supermarkets, fast food chains, gas stations, etc) haven’t being fucked in the ass for a long time. But now it “hurts me, let’s have solidarity”. No sympathy for them. Eat shit.

      • dudebro@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Because actors already make way more money on average for a much easier job than most people on the planet.

        Children in Burundi deserve more before the people in Hollywood.

    • DragonAce@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      These big name actors are fighting for the people that are part of SAG that are extras or do stunts who make jack shit from most productions. These people are fighting for members of their union, this has nothing to do with anything else.