• vividspecter@lemm.eeOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    78
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    25 days ago

    Frankly, there should be jail time for this level of environmental vandalism. Especially since the defendants haven’t shown even the slightest bit of remorse:

    A judgment published on Friday said the prosecutor had noted there was “no evidence of insight, contrition, or remorse from the defendants and the defendants concede that there is no evidence of remorse.”

  • Minarble@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    39
    ·
    25 days ago

    Pocket change. It’s just easier and cheaper to pay the fine if they happen to get one.

    Triple the land cleared should be repatriated by the commonwealth and the previous owner fined to the extent that complete rewilding requires.

    • ladicius@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      25 days ago

      “It’s a price, not a fine.”

      Yep. Like that guy who bought an old english building protected by conservation law and destroyed it to build a modern house. Had to rebuild the pub until the very last stone and was made to pay for that very costly effort.