Summary

Donald Trump criticized Panama Canal fees as “ridiculous” and demanded lower costs or the canal’s return to the US.

In a Truth Social post, Trump also expressed concern about potential Chinese influence over the waterway, despite no direct Chinese control of canal operations.

The canal, transferred to Panama in 1999, is vital for global trade, handling 5% of maritime traffic.

Trump’s comments follow record revenues of $5 billion announced by the Panama Canal Authority. Panama has not yet responded to his statements.

  • fxomt@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    Not all of us are American, I for one would love to block all news from the US; It’s extra salt in the wound that this was posted on WORLD news.

      • fxomt@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        14
        ·
        1 day ago

        It’s about trump threatening panama, is that not US politics to you?

        The main focus here is clearly the US, panama is just the subject.

          • fxomt@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            19
            ·
            1 day ago

            What would US politics be, then?

            This is about the US, and its diplomacy with panama. It is not, by definition, international politics. The US and trump, as i said, are clearly the focus in this article. If it was vice versa, ie, X country interacting with the US, for example, it would be passable. This is US internal politics.

            Why couldn’t have this been posted to a US news community? why this of all places?

            • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              5 hours ago

              What would US politics be, then?

              Anything related to domestic policy? News from the regional, state and/or local levels?

              • fxomt@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                5 hours ago

                As i’ve already said in other comments, i’ve changed my mind, and i agree. I was just tired of hearing of trump and US news all the time, and made that comment.

            • njm1314@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              23
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 day ago

              Yes by definition the diplomacy between two Nations is International politics. If it was internal us politics then it would be United States politics. I’m not sure what’s complicated about this, it’s common sense.

              Of course it could also be posted to a US News community. It could also be posted to a Panama news Community I suppose. Sometimes posts are appropriate more than one community.

              • fxomt@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                13
                ·
                1 day ago

                On second thought, yeah, you’re probably right. I’m just really tired of hearing about trump, and my comments were a knee jerk reaction. Sorry.

            • EldritchFeminity@lemmy.blahaj.zone
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              9
              ·
              1 day ago

              By your own logic, that wouldn’t be international news - it would be x country news and shouldn’t be posted here either. Why would it be “passable” if the news was about another country doing it?

              When Trump starts threatening to glass the EU with ICBMs, would that be US news only and not international? After all, it would be about the US and its arsenal of nuclear weapons.

              • fxomt@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 day ago

                That was probably a bad definition, sorry. I’m just tired of hearing of US news. But yeah, i would agree that the example would be international news.

                • EldritchFeminity@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  8
                  ·
                  1 day ago

                  I totally get it, I live in the US and I’m so goddamn sick of hearing about this nonsense. The worst part for everybody else is how much money is in the US economy, which means that basically everything we do affects the world and is therefore international/world news.

                  • MutilationWave@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    ·
                    18 hours ago

                    One of the first things he’s going to do is increase taxes on the poor and what’s left of the middle class and give tax breaks to the rich and corporations. Even that is world news in my opinion just because of the US status as pretty much the only world superpower. My country spends more on the military than the rest of the top 10 combined.

                  • fxomt@lemm.ee
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    3
                    ·
                    1 day ago

                    Yeah, same. and probably hearing trump’s name all the time will make you easily annoyed by hearing the word “US”.

        • kent_eh@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          1 day ago

          When one country’s (soon to be) leader directly threatens another country, this is by definition “international”.

          I agree that Trump is getting far more attention that a person like him deserves, but him being the next head of a major nation makes him impossible to completely ignore.

          • fxomt@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 day ago

            Yup, as i said in another comment, i’ve changed my mind. I just really am annoyed of hearing of trump all the time, and made this comment.

        • AA5B@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          19 hours ago

          This does seem important globally. We know from history, and this shows he’s starting again from before he matters, that US diplomacy will be threaten first. Unfortunately this what y’all have to look forward to as our way of doing business, with allies, independents, and competitors

    • hungryphrog@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 day ago

      This one may not be that important, but I would like to remind you that unfortunately the bullshit 'murica does does affect the rest of us.

      • fxomt@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        Yep, i agree. It’s just really tiring to see US news most of the time. This was probably a knee jerk reaction from me. Sorry.