Hi! I’m seeking some advice and sanity check on hopping from Ubuntu to Fedora on my personal PC. I’ve been using Ubuntu LTS for almost two years now, switched from Windows and never looked back. But I cannot say I know Linux well. I use my PC for browsing, some gaming with Steam (I have AMD GPU), occasional video editing, tinkering with some self-hosted stuff that is on separate hardware.

I don’t like the way Ubuntu is moving with snaps. And LTS version falls behind too much. So I decided to move to Fedora.

My plan is simple:

  1. I will install Fedora on a fresh nvme drive. I want disk encryption, so I’m going to have LUKS over btrfs for /home, and the root will remain unencrypted.
  2. I will copy all files from old /home to new /home, with the exception of dot-files.
  3. I plan to make use of flatpaks, so I don’t think configuration for my apps is easily transferable. I’ll have to install and configure apps from scratch, unless I’ll have to use an RPM package.

Does all of this make sense? Is there a way to simplify app re-configuration in my case?

And as I never used Fedora extensively (booting from live image doesn’t count), are there any caveats I should be aware of?

  • _cnt0@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    1 year ago

    Enable rpmfusion for media codecs and things like libdvdcss or unrestricted mesa drivers: https://rpmfusion.org/Configuration

    https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/quick-docs/installing-plugins-for-playing-movies-and-music/

    Fedora comes out of the box with a curated flatpak repo. You might want to replace that with flathub: https://flatpak.org/setup/Fedora

    Imho, there’s no reason not to enable disk encryption for root. Luks configuration during setup is very straightforward.

    If you don’t have nvidia graphics, enable uefi and secure boot (no legacy options). Fedora works well with it out of the box.

    • Pantherina@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      This is essential. sudo dnf install libavcodec-freeworld may already be enough if you dont need ffmpeg for anything.

      Or you use ublue, where rpmfusion and ffmpeg are preinstalled.

  • mintycactus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 year ago
    1. Usually all flatpaks data are saved in ~/.var/app, so move it as well, configuration of those apps should not be issue, maybe in some rare cases.
  • NotAnArdvark@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    Are you leaving behind the dotfiles because you don’t want to bring over any of your old configuration?

    For whatever it’s worth, you can remove Snap support from your Ubuntu system. If you want more current software, AppImage and Flatpaks are good for that.

    • Avid Amoeba@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Removing snap is somewhat unwise. Ignoring it is the safe way to go. Ubuntu might ship a system component you’re not aware of via snap. If you kill snap support you may end up with a broken system. To avoid headaches, simply ignore snap.

      • folkrav@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        If one dislikes snaps, the even wiser choice is just skipping Ubuntu altogether.

  • EponymousBosh@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Honestly, if you like Ubuntu but dislike Snaps, Linux Mint might be a better choice than Fedora if you’re not as comfortable with Linux. Mint is basically “Ubuntu without all Canonical’s garbage.”

    • Pantherina@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Do not use Mint. Ubuntu uses GNOME which is modern and secure. Mint will need a year or so to get Wayland support, and it will always be behind on security updates. Just run unsnap, install the apps and Gnome tweaks you want I would say.

  • Maestro@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Why not move to Debian? Ubuntu was born in a time when Debian stable had a really long release cycle and wasn’t desktop ready. But times have changed. Debian is a great desktop without all of Canonical’s Ubuntu “experiments” like snap.

  • lemmyvore@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    You don’t have to use an LTS version if you don’t want to stick to it… Also Fedora is on a yearly upgrade cycle too, just so you know, it’s not a rolling distro. You can actually upgrade sooner on Ubuntu because it’s on a 6-month upgrade cycle.

    • Audacity9961@feddit.ch
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Fedora is on a six monthly cycle just like non-LTS Ubuntu; neither distro is on a yearly release cycle. The previous release is just supported for an extra six months, for one year of support per release for Fedora.

      Fedora itself isn’t rolling but the kernel and mesa packages do roll between releases, and it is more bleeding edge than Ubuntu generally.

  • Pantherina@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I want to write a script for this app config backup stuff once. Also working on Windows, but maan I have low motivation on that one haha.

    You can use your configs, relevant for me are

    • firefox: ~/.mozilla/firefox can stay if you keep using Fedora Firefox
    • thunderbird ~/.thunderbird/ copied to ~/.var/app/org.mozilla.Thunderbird/.thunderbird
    • libreoffice from somewhere to the flatpak directory (useful if you have a custom dictionary, autocompletions or interface)
    • qgis, element

    Many other apps use the same structure with a profile folder so easily transferrable.

    In firefox and thunderbird you either delete the whole contents and replace everything, or you only paste the contents of your *-default-release folder in the new default release folder, after deleting its contents.

    Flatpak apps need to be ran once, to create the ~/.var/app/ subfolder. After that you can close them and replace everything. If you delete that folder, or move it somewhere as a backup, the settings are reset to default. Pretty cool.

    If you want to try the new image-based distro model, I can highly recommend ublue and their installer. It has all the codecs out of the box and also an nvidia version which will never break basically, if it should, you can roll back to your previous system that worked.

    It is a very cool distro model, and ublue has loots of customizations. If you never tried KDE I recommend their kinoite-main (do not use any -nokmods, these images are outdated as they removed kmods from -main !)

  • danielfgom@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    Don’t move to Fedora. They are Red Hat and recently shat all over Free Software principles and broke the GPL by making Red Hat Enterprise CLOSED SOURCE.

    They are dead to the Linux and Free Software world. You’ll be going from bad to worse.

    I HIGHLY recommend Linux Mint Debian Edition 6. It’s based directly on Debian (one of the oldest distros ever and the best), is Free Software loving and 100% Community. No Greedy Corp Inc in sight.

    It runs the excellent Cinnamon desktop and the Mint team have set up all the apps etc perfectly. And because it’s Debian it’s super reliable and has massive amounts of apps etc .

    • folkrav@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s basically the opposite. Fedora is the community based upstream, and some of it reaches RHEL, but Fedora isn’t Red Hat.

      What Red Hat did was limit who they distribute the source code to to paid customers, and add provisions to their TOS to give them the right to end their paid contract with you if you redistribute it. You aren’t prevented from doing so, but choosing to do so prevents you from getting future versions, which you were only entitled to through said contract. They also still open-source to CentOS Stream, just upstream of RHEL.

      Now, do I think it was a good move by RH, no. Was it legal, probably, yes, but IANAL, eventual courts will tell. Did it go against the “spirit” of the GPL, maybe, yes. But is RHEL open-source? No, it’s objectively not. Please, don’t spread misinformation.

      • danielfgom@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Literally the majority of the developers working there are full time Red Hat employees. It’s Red Hat disguised as community.

        • Carl George@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          The last time the project leader measured it, only about 40% of Fedora contributors were known to be Red Hat employees. So while it’s a big chunk, it’s not a majority.

    • Pantherina@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Imagine working on big parts of the Linux desktop and projects just use your source code and build exact clones off your Distro, while all the developers you pay need the income to keep contributing to awesome modern software.

      It is difficult but businesses are asked if Linux Desktop needs money, not hobby users.